The Canadian military is trying to buy new pistols, again

Here we go again. After years with no success, the Canadian military has re-booted its pistol procurement program. Now, the Department of Defense plans to buy as many as 20,000 pistols.

Newspapers (the Chronicle-Herald, the Ottawa Citizen, etc.) say the feds plan to request bids on the supply contract in 2021. Fulfilment should start in summer of 2022. The plan is to buy a minimum of 9,000 pistols, and possibly as many as 15,000-20,000 as the procurement program progresses.

Many readers will remember we've been here before. The Canadian military has needed new pistols for many years. Earlier in the 2000s, the government asked firearms manufacturers for pricing on 10,000 new pistols. Oh yes—and regardless of who got the contract, the pistols themselves would actually have to be assembled at Kitchener, Ontario's Colt Canada plant. Some manufacturers didn't like the sound of that, fearing they'd lose proprietary manufacturing information to a potential competitor. The Canadian government went back to the drawing board, and started working on another procurement plan that kicked the purchase even further down the road, with fulfilment as late as 2026.

It seems the government, for some reason, has a renewed urgency now, and wants to get this deal done in the next few months. At this point, the Department of Defense hasn't said how much it's willing to spend on the new pistols. However, back in 2016, the feds told reporters they expected to spend $50 million on 15,000-20,000 pistols and spare parts.

The current issue pistol

Currently, the Canadian military is using Browning Hi-Power pistols chambered in 9mmx19. The Hi-Power design dates back to the 1920s. Various militaries adopted it in the 1930s, and used it during World War II. While Canada's pistols may not all have that many years of use on them, the military's handguns are still well-known to be worn-out and unreliable, and have long been due for replacement.

Ruger has bought Marlin from Remington

Longtime lever gun manufacturer Marlin is about to change ownership again. Sturm, Ruger and Co. has bought the company from Remington for $30 million.

As we told you earlier this year, Remington is currently in the middle of selling off its assets, due to its second bankruptcy in two years. There's considerable speculation this bankruptcy is tied to the company's involvement in a lawsuit with families of victims from the Sandy Hook mass shooting. True or not, the facts are: Remington is selling off parts of its company, and according to documents filed in federal court, Ruger is hoping to buy Marlin.

Remington bought Marlin back in December, 2007, and immediately ran into problems. Marlin's production lines in Connecticut were a mess. Remington had to basically rebuild the whole manufacturing process when it started making the company's famous lever rifles in New York. Marlin firearms built early under Remington ownership had poor fit and finish, but that reputation turned around in recent years. Now, Remington builds Marlins in its Ilion, New York, plant.

That might change, under new Ruger ownership. Now, at least, if Ruger moves the Marlin production setup, everything has supposedly been modernized. It should be much easier to relocate now, with hopefully no dip in quality.

The rest of Remington

What about Remington's other subsidiaries? Supposedly Sierra wants to buy Barnes. JJE Capital Holdings is said to want DPMS, H&R, Stormlake, AAC, and Parker brands (remember H&R single-shots? Maybe this would mean we'd see them back on the market). Franklin Armory wants to acquire Bushmaster, and Sportsman's Warehouse wants to buy Tapco. Roundhill Group wants to buy up some other pieces.

While Remington flounders in crippling debt, forcing it into Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the rest of the US firearms industry is barreling forward at top speed. Thanks to pandemic fears and social unrest, 2020 has seen month after month of record-breaking guns and ammo sales. Remington might be in big financial trouble, but everyone else has lots of money to step in and take over.

Nova Scotia man charged with weapons offences after confrontation over alleged forcible confinement, abandonment of child

RCMP in Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, have charged a 19-year-old man with weapons offences after a confrontation, which started when he allegedly saw another man confining a child in a car trunk.

In the incident's aftermath, here's what police told Global News and other outlets. According to the Mounties, the incident started in a strip mall parking lot, when the 19-year-old man saw a 33-year-old man take a child from his car, and put her in the trunk when he went into a store. When this 33-year-old man exited the store, he allegedly removed the child from his trunk and placed her in the car, whereupon he was confronted by the 19-year-old onlooker, who had called police and told them what was going on.

According to the RCMP, the teenager had retrieved a firearm from his own vehicle, and was carrying it when he confronted the other man. The 19-year-old then tried to stop the man from leaving with the child, but was unsuccessful. The police showed up, and according to Global, charged the 19-year-old with careless use of a firearm, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, and using a firearm in the commission of an offence.

Police eventually located the 33-year-old man with the child, and charged that man with criminal negligence, abandonment and forcible confinement. More charges may be forthcoming, police say. Both the 19-year-old and 33-year-old are due in court on December 7. Both men were released on conditions.

A lawyer's thoughts

Alberta-based lawyer Ian Runkle has some thoughts on this case, which he shares in the video below. If you've got questions or strong reactions to this news story, you should hear out Runkle's opinions.

What Runkle doesn't mention: Nova Scotians could understandably be on-edge when it comes to Good Samaritan activities these days. Supposedly, some of the victims of this spring's Portapique massacre were murdered when they tried to stop one of the killings, which could explain the 19-year-old's actions. That's just speculation, though—if this gets to trial, no doubt we'll hear a detailed explanation of his actions.

 

Is there an ammunition shortage in Canada?

Is there an ammunition shortage in Canada right now? Recently, I went to my local Canadian Tire, looking for .30-30 ammo. The shelves were empty—none of the classic low-priced (or formerly low-priced, at least) Federal, Winchester or Remington stuff.

"Weird," I thought. "Moose and bear season are here in New Brunswick, deer season starts pretty soon. They need to re-stock, ASAP." But if you've seen Calibre's latest print issue, you know this shouldn't be surprising. Firearms industry insiders started warning us of impending ammo shortages in Canada this spring. As far back as March, one localish gun seller advised me all ammo was going up 15 percent in price this year, and he didn't know what he'd be able to get out of the US, period. The situation is bad enough that CBC is actually reporting on it, with small-town retailers saying they can't get needed ammunition to keep their customers going through hunting season. In some rural communities, that can be a big problem, as wild game is an important part of many Canadians' winter diet.

That wasn't the only ammo I needed. Nobody local had a sale on 12 gauge waterfowl loads, and Cabela's did. So, I ordered a 100-round case there, expecting some story about backlogged orders. Surprise! The shells showed up pretty quickly, with no problems at all. Again, weird!

And then I saw this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=56&v=MjTzULmPoLI&feature=emb_logo

It turns out that, at least from an American perspective, we've got lots and lots of ammo. Indeed, some of those store shelves do seem pretty full. So what gives?

Why the discrepancy?

I think there's two things going on here. Your perspective on ammo availability greatly depends on where you're shopping, and who you are. The reality of the Canadian firearms industry is that larger companies have the edge over smaller shops. Cabela's has lots of ammo in its central warehouse, so if you're ordering from its website, it's easy to ship that ammunition out directly. Canadian Tire might have lots of ammo in its warehouses as well, and that's easy for individual franchises to acquire if they're close by. If they're further away from distribution centres, the realities of supply chain challenges during COVID-19 might make it harder for smaller stores to get ammo. This is just a guess, mind you.

But, in either case—at least there's ammo on the shelves. If I'd wanted to spend $40 on a box of .30-30 ammo at Canadian Tire, I could have. That's just not an option in much of the US right now. The pandemic panic, followed by social unrest, cleaned the shelves out. If you're worried about your local ammunition shortage, it could be much, much worse.

Here's the new Savage Rascal Minimalist

Savage is keen on its new Minimalist stock design—so keen that it's now available on the single-shot Rascal beginner rimfire rifle. The new Savage Rascal Minimalist is now popping up on the company's website, in two colour schemes. Both rifles sell for a premium over the standard plastic-stocked Rascal models.

The Minimalist stock design offers no flashy modern features; it's simply a reshaped buttstock that's supposed to reduce weight and offer modern ergonomics. Savage debuted in earlier in 2020, offering it on Mark II series and 93 series rimfire rifles.

So far, the Minimalist rifles have all had laminate stock construction, and that's the case with the new Rascal models. No doubt owners will find the trimmed-down design helps keep the stock from feeling clunky and heavy.

Along with the new stock design, the new Rascal Minimalist also has a 1/2-28 threaded barrel, with muzzle cap. Given that it's chambered in .22LR, a muzzle brake isn't necessary, though, and Canadians will be unable to legally install a suppressor. The Rascal Minimalist also has a user-adjustable Accu-Trigger and peep sights, a 16 1/8-inch barrel, a manual safety, and they've got an 11.5-inch length of pull. That's slightly more than plastic-stocked Rascal models, but it should still be kid-friendly. Unloaded, the rifle only weighs 3.5 pounds.

Pink or Blue?

The Rascal Minimalist comes with either a teal/grey laminate stock, or pink/purple. Both versions have a $279 MSRP in the US; at this point, we haven't seen Canadian retail pricing. We shouldn't see a crazy markup over US pricing, since Savage builds the Rascal at its Lakefield plant in Ontario. However, it will certainly be more expensive than the standard kids' rifles. When the Mark II Minimalist models debuted in Canada, they sold around the $400 mark.

Find more details on the new Rascal and other Minimalist rifles at Savage's website.

After gun owners protest on Parliament Hill, media responses are vastly different

So, for gun owners who were paying attention, there was a march at Parliament Hill on September 12. The marchers were protesting this spring's Order in Council which banned a wide range of tactical and sporting rifles and shotguns. . In the aftermath, there are curious differences between media reports on the rally.

The Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights (CCFR,) organized the march. Officially, it was called the Integrity March, and not a protest, as the organizers said "The CCFR believes that protests carry inherent risks." Instead of an angry confrontation, the CCFR said the goal was  "to draw attention to our cause, motivate and unite gun owners and provoke a conversation about the injustice and ineffectiveness of gun bans. The march also gives gun owners an opportunity to show Canadians who they really are; we are your friends, your colleagues and your neighbors."

The Integrity March got plenty of publicity through forums and social media. Judging from online chatter, people attended from not just central Canada, but also the West. Atlantic Canada's restrictive COVID-19 interprovincial border controls effectively prohibited Maritimers from attending.

Different stories

In the days since, two narratives have come out in the media. One message, as seen from Global News and in Canadian Press articles, quotes the Parliamentary Protective Services as saying 800 people attended. The CBC uses that number, but also points out the CCFR said thousands of people were in attendance. The Toronto Sun seems to think thousands showed up. So how many people were really at Parliament Hill?

Well, according to the CCFR, as many as 5,000 people showed up. Even if they over-estimated by as much as 2,000 attendees, a significant error, we'd still be left with maybe 3,000 protestors. That's still almost four times the official number that news orgs are reporting.

How'd this happen? There are multiple possibilities, but back when I was a journalism student, instructors taught us how to estimate attendance. The reason was simple. If there was an event where a political candidate, CEO or some other person was trying to flim-flam the reporter for their own ends, you wouldn't be fooled. So, there should have been a reporter on-scene that was capable of doing this basic guesstimate. Indeed, there was a camera crew from CBC on-hand.

If you want to guess how many people were there for yourself, there's footage of the event on YouTube, like this bit here, or several clips from The Rebel. Does it look like attendance under-reported? If so? Why?

Video: Are 10 gauge, 12 gauge shotguns now illegal in Canada?

So, what's the deal: Are 10 gauge and 12 gauge shotguns now illegal in Canada? Edmonton-based lawyer Ian Runkle is here to break down his thoughts on the issue, if you've got some time to spare (video runs below).

First, remember the background to this story. On May 1, 2020, Justin Trudeau announced the federal government's latest gun regulations, with a particular focus on semi-automatic sport and hunting rifles, like the AR-15. There were several other regulatory changes in the Order-In-Council, including a ban on firearms with a bore more than 20mm, and a ban on firearms "capable of discharging a projectile with a muzzle energy greater than 10,000 Joules."

Both those changes are concerning for shotgun owners, as some highly specialized 12 gauge ammunition supposedly has a muzzle energy exceeding that limit, and some 10 gauge and 12 gauge shotguns may also have a bore more than 20mm, depending how and where you measure the bore. Public Safety Minister Bill Blair has repeatedly told the public and parliament that the new rules aren't targeted at sporting shotguns, duck hunters have nothing to worry about, and so on. The RCMP firearms website echoes that statement.

Fact check

Is that correct? As Runkle points out in this video, it's not so cut-and-dry as Blair wants people to believe.

 

This whole video is well worth watching, if you want a detailed breakdown of the issue, but in a nutshell it comes down to this: It doesn't matter what Blair or the RCMP say the law means. From a legal standpoint, all that matters is what the law actually says, how all law enforcement agencies (not just the RCMP) apply the law in practice, and most of all, how the courts interpret the law. The language in the updated regulations is currently unclear, says Runkle. Even if Blair and the RCMP are saying one thing now, their answer may not hold any legal weight down the road.

For more of Runkle's thoughts on this issue and other firearms legal matters, see his Facebook page here.

Trijicon and Holosun quickly settle patent infringement accusation

Here's an oddity: A legal battle settled almost as soon as it started. Back in July of 2020, firearms optics manufacturer Trijicon filed a patent infringement suit against competitor Holosun. Not even two months later, it's all been sorted out. Trijicon and Holosun aren't saying exactly what the terms are.

Trijicon and Holosun are two well-known manufacturers in the tactical optics game. Both companies build battery-powered reflex sights that allow for quick shooting. Most of Trijicon's products are manufactured in Michigan or California, while Holosun makes its optics in China. Holosun's sights are significantly lower-priced than Trijicon sights. Both companies are seeing their products in high demand these days, as firearms sales are booming in the US. The tactical rifle market is especially hot, and that's where Trijicon and Holoson sights are very popular, although some of the sights involved here were aimed at the pistol market.

Trijicon aimed its patent infringement suit at nine Holosun sights. The complaint seems based around a 2013 Trijicon patent that relates to the sight housing. Trijicon accused Holosun of knowingly importing and selling sights that infringed on this patent, Bloomberg says.

Quick resolution

Normally, these legal scraps take months to work out in court, maybe even years. Surprisingly, Trijicon and Holosun settled their dispute and come to an agreement in a matter of weeks, although neither party is saying exactly how the deal went down. Holosun's Facebook page says “We look forward to spirited competition in the marketplace and continuing to create innovative products for professionals, competitors, and enthusiasts. The unique technologies packed into Holosun optical sights make aiming and shooting faster and more intuitive while providing unparalleled value to our customers.

Trijicon's website says "Trijicon successfully defended its intellectual property around reflex sight features and technology," with Trijicon president/CEO saying "We invest heavily in research, development, and testing at Trijicon to ensure our optics are ready to perform for the most demanding users, and we are committed to defending that investment in innovation.” Neither Trijicon nor Holosun would divulge the terms of the settlement, though. No doubt there will be some trickle-down effect on consumers, but there's been no announcement of any Holosun optics dropping from the market at this point.

Ultimatum Deadline: Part 1

A few years ago, a new and enterprising rifle manufacturer eased their way into the Canadian gun consciousness from the rolling hills of Chilliwack, British Columbia, under the name of Ultimatum Precision. Unveiling their first action; the U300, back in 2016, Ultimatum’s first effort was not to be, with overly heavy bolt lift issues plaguing the U300’s production. Some guns were sorted out in the field through design revisions, but eventually the plug was pulled, and all orders refunded with a promise of discounted pricing on the pending Ultimatum Deadline for all those that had placed an order.

Ultimatum Deadline

Intended to both fix the U300’s overt failings and bake in a handful of additional features to improve the design, the mix of the Deadline’s design promises and Ultimatum’s customer service stickhandling ensured a healthy supply of Deadline orders, and today Ultimatum offers the Deadline in right- and left-handed variants, in both long- and short-actions, and in either repeater or single-shot formats. And we’ve been pining for one ever since we heard it was replacing the defunct U300.

And this is it, albeit in short-action, left-handed, repeater form (so specified by yours truly). So what do you get when you throw down the required $1,500 Canadian Pesos for one of Canada’s newest rifle designs? Well, to be frank, a surprisingly small but heavy black box containing the Deadline action, a bolt body, a bolt head, and all the bits you need to get it up and running… including both a unique Ultimatum barrel nut, barrel nut wrench, and action wrench. It’s all nicely packed in cut foam, and came with a pair of Ultimatum stickers and the obligatory Ultimatum patches, of course. Although obviously unassembled, the action isn’t shipped completely bare; Ultimatum goes through the effort of assembling the bolt for you, as well as affixes a rail to the action, and installs the bolt stop/release.

Beginning with the receiver itself, there’s a lot to take to in, and it generally begins with the initial assessment that this thing is beefy… very, very beefy. In fact, the bare receiver alone weighs in at a whopping 646 grams (1.42 pounds). Since you’re invariably now thinking, “But how much is that really,” we’ll end the suspense: This short-action receiver alone, as you see it represented here in the photos, weighs more than an unloaded Glock 17. And it’s easy to see why. Starting at the receiver’s rear, the tang is more like a tank, measuring 6 millimetres (0.236 inches) thick on our calipers. That’s nice, since it means you’ll never worry about breaking or even bending the tang as you torque down the rear action screw. Underneath the tang area sits another nice touch; a heavily inletted trigger pocket (in order to clear as many triggers as possible) that serves to locate a very nicely machined trigger hanger that is affixed with a single screw. On other rifles, trigger hangers can be used to perfect the timing of the interaction between the trigger and sear, typically with the aim of making the action easier to work. Here, we suspect it’s also to make trigger installations and changes easier for the customer and move the trigger downward. But more on that later.

Ultimatum Deadline

From there we arrive at the part of the receiver that houses the bolt normally. Here, again, the Ultimatum impresses with its pure girth. From side to side this receiver measured just over 32 millimetres (1.29 inches) wide. The bolt bore is cleanly drilled and from the nitride finish of the interior surface, it almost appears to have been polished or ground, as it’s glass-smooth. Also, note the lack of milled or broached raceways for bolt lugs; instead the Ultimatum uses a design we’ve seen on other rifles (various German-built designs and the popular Ruger American springing to mind) wherein the bolt stop guides the bolt fore and aft by riding in a groove machined into the bolt body. That reduces the machine operations in production, which inherently aids accuracy, and it keeps the cylindrical shape of the receiver intact; creating a stiffer action.

Outside, the nitride finish is wonderful and uniform. The Ultimatum logo is engraved behind the small-as-possible ejection port, which is actually even smaller than it looks, due to the ridiculously thick receiver walls. It measured out to around 17 millimetres (0.67 inches) tall; about 5 millimetres (0.2 inches) larger than a .308’s case head diameter. Again, the goal served here is to keep the action as intact as possible, aiding stiffness.

On the opposite side of the receiver, a Deadline motif is well engraved from the bolt stop forward, which itself is the solitary piece of brightwork on the action. A small silver tab, it’s operated by pushing forward, and inward. Forward of that sits the overpressure gas ports; designed to vent excess gases safely away from the shooter’s face. These also work in concert with an internal safety shroud that should keep any errant gases from travelling up past the bolt head, as well. On that subject, the bolt’s firing pin channel also vents into the magazine well and has additional shrouding of its own.

Finally, we arrive at the massive integral recoil lug and barrel threading. Ultimatum proudly states their integral recoil lug is a full 5/16” thick (7.9 millimetres), and although the thickness is impressive, it’s the “integral” part of that sentence that’s actually so sought after. There’s no way the action moves around atop this recoil lug and mechanically it’s superior to a recoil lug affixed around the barrel or pinned in place. Not that those don’t work, it’s simply that an oversized integral recoil lug such as this just has less parts, less to go wrong, and more accuracy as a result.

Ultimatum Deadline

Which brings us to the barrel threading. After flirting with other threading options, Ultimatum’s turned to the most popular option: Savage’s small shank 1-16” x 20 TPI threading. That means all manner of Savage barrels will fit; from homegrown IBI tubes to Shilens to even factory Savage barrels. It also means these actions go together in a familiar and well documented way (although the Ultimatum documentation is excellent), in the Savage fashion. Of course, if one so desired a shouldered barrel could be tightened down and finish chambered, alternatively. Ultimatum’s documentation provides the necessary dimensions.

Atop the receiver, a 20 MOA rail is fitted… not integrally machined in. By using two dowel pins to locate the rail and six #8-40 machine screws to secure it to the receiver, Ultimatum claims it’s just as capable of handling the heaviest optics, and we don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t. Plus, since it’s not integral it can be swapped out, should a different cant than the factory-supplies 20 MOA be desired.

And finally, below, one of the Ultimatum Deadline’s improvements over the U300: A magazine well that accommodates AICS or AW magazines. AICS, or “Accuracy International Chassis System” magazines feature a longer internal dimension (handy for seating longer, or loading longer bullets), but are quite a bit more compact due to their double-stack nature. That double stack also makes them a lot less reliable with heavily tapered rounds, though, which is why some shooters prefer the centre-feed, single stack, longer Accuracy International Artic Warfare (or AW) magazines. In the case of the Deadline, you stock or chassis choice will dictate that; a real boon on a rifle designed to be easily built and rebuilt.

The Ultimatum Deadline's bolt, packaged in its own foam slot, continues the plus-sized trend we’ve noted this far: The aforementioned full-diameter fluted bolt body is a whopping 23.5 millimetres (0.925 inches) in diameter. By comparison, a Bergara HMR bolt, lifted from what is essentially an improved Remington 700 action, has a bolt body that’s just 20.2 millimetres (0.795 inches) across. On the scale, a complete short-action Bergara bolt (with a slight slathering of Ballistol… we do pull these out of our storage safe for these comparisons, after all) weighs in at 334 grams (11.8 ounces). The Deadline bolt? 370 grams, or 13 ounces. It is, just like so much else about this action, very, very large… and very, very smartly designed, to boot.

Ultimatum Deadline

For example, because Ultimatum designed this gun to be easy to work on and easy to modify, field stripping the bolt can be accomplished in about three seconds, sans tools. Twist the rear of the bolt in the same direction the bolt rotates in the action (clockwise for right-handed actions, counter clockwise for left-handed actions), and it will release the striker assembly from the bolt body. With that done, the pin holding the bolt head to the bolt body can be pushed out, and the bolt head replaced. And here’s the first and only gripe we’ve got with this action: Our action arrived with a trio of bolt heads, meaning we can use this short-action with a wide variety of chamberings, but there’s no way to identify them. The bolt face diameter really should be laser engraved on each one somewhere. To a lesser degree we also would prefer to see a Sako-style extractor, but having shot plenty of rifles with the same Savage-style extractor used by the Ultimatum Deadline without issue, we can’t really fault the choice. And with the dual ejectors housed in the bolt-face, we suspect that getting rounds out of the action won’t be a problem, regardless of how slowly it’s worked. We love the 60-degree bolt lift offered by the three-lug format too; we don’t necessarily find it to be demonstrably faster than a convention two-lug action, but it does keep your hands clear of any optics, and that’s a nice touch.

Assembled, the overbuilt receiver and girthy bolt combine for a stripped weight of 1,015 grams (2.24 pounds). It feels great, too; the polished interior surface of the receiver and the massive bolt body combine to make for an incredibly slick action. Impressively, there is almost no appreciable increase in bolt play at any point, either. Tugging the tail of the bolt left, right, up and down produces the same amount of movement regardless of where the bolt is in its travel. And once closed, you can appreciate the slight rearward rake of the very long, very large bolt handle, too. Oh, and the bolt lift; the subject of much derision around the original Ultimatum U300 action? It’s fine. Online claims peg it right around seven pounds, which we’ll test once we have it assembled.

Which is what we’re going to be doing here. In the next issue, we’re going to follow the process of screwing a barrel to the Ultimatum action, and hopefully we’ll round that update out with a trigger installation too. Then, in the following issue, we’ll discuss the options and what it takes to stick one of these in a chassis or stock, because while the trigger hanger accepts most Remington 700 barrels, and the receiver accepts all small-shank Savage barrels, the receiver itself is something slightly different. Remember how we mentioned the trigger hanger was partly responsible for moving the trigger down in relation to the bore? Well, that’s because the massive bolt body protrudes lower than a conventional Remington 700 action, which had to be accounted for in the design. So while it has an almost-Remington 700 footprint, it’s different enough to warrant talking about. But that’s literally a story for another day. In the meantime, we’re happy to report that if our experience thus far is indicative of Ultimatum’s quality, they’re one more Canadian gunmaker that’s going to be around for a while.