DOMINION ARMS GRIZZLY TORTURE TESTED

There we were, innocently plinking away in the bush with a new Dominion Arms Grizzly on a frosty Canadian Saturday in the middle of winter.  This gun was running nicely; we haven’t been huge fans of past editions to be honest but Dominion Arms seems to have really gotten these 870 clones sorted.  That said, we have to point out that it was actually our second tester: the first was a factory defect that was replaced after it failed on the first round, weeks earlier.  It was immediately replaced by Dominion Arms’ distributor, Canada Ammo, and we’d be confident that if you get a defect they’ll take care of you, but despite our happiness with the second iteration, we have no choice but to point out that the first didn’t function.

DSC_0024We’re pretty confident that this was an anomaly, however, and this is why: the action was really smooth, the gun is generally overbuilt and we have to admit, even the finish was pretty nice.  The brass bead sight was icing on the cake: this is a classy rendition of the 870, and Remington should take notes.  It’s nicer than the entry-level models from the factory. We were hammering trap loads and buck through it without a care in the world, and the only negative to speak of was picking wads out of the snow.

But we work for Calibre, and it’s never enough for us to just enjoy a pleasant day of shooting.  No, we had to turn it into something work related.  Something that wasn’t just entertaining, but bizarre, destructive, and frankly insane.

DSC_0022“What if,” we speculated, “what if our plinking day camp was overrun by an army of former snowboarding instructors and hair models, bent on firearms confiscation? What if we had no choice but to chuck the Grizzly in the bush, and come back for it later, when our campfire-and-lawn-chairs arrangement had become the nucleus of a partisan camp, hidden out in the bush?  The nerve centre of the Great Canadian Resistance?”

No alcohol was required to imagine this scenario, incidentally.  We’re just a little…unique.

The Ditching

DSC_0043And so the abuse of a serviceable and, in our opinion, impressive, quality shotgun began.  We’d gotten it hot from shooting, but the first wave of snowboarding instructors overwhelmed us, and we chucked it, empty and action open, into a snowbank.  The steel hissed angrily.

We narrowly escaped the shock troops of the hair model battalion, who steamrolled through the area, leaving nothing but promises to replant trees and piles of empty soy latte cups in their wake.  We knew the shotgun wouldn’t stay hidden forever, so we came back shortly afterwards to bury it properly.  Owning to the secrecy of our mission, we had no choice but to cut corners, and threw the gun ten metres into a culvert without taking the time to close the action.  The muddy, rocky bottom of the ditch did respond to our vicious and aggressive digging, however, using the only tool available at the time: the shotgun.  Having dug its own grave, we laid it to rest, action still open, and buried it, hoping to return once the Calibre army was large enough to face the friendly and heavily indebted, but dangerous, snowboarders.

DSC_0063We rebuilt the campfire and returned for the Dominion Arms Grizzly.  Meltwater had filled it with gritty mud.  We shook it out and worked the action forcefully, looked through the barrel side loaded a round.

DSC_0066It fired, extracted, and ejected, but the second trigger press failed to release the hammer.  The gun was literally full of mud.  We shook out as much as we could and got it to fire intermittently, but the action felt like we were rubbing sandpaper on an alligator. There was only one intelligent choice: clean it properly, and lube it.

We didn’t do that.

The Burning

DSC_0091The campfire was crackling away happily and, all oils, greases, and cleaning products having been confiscated for use on the luxuriously coiffed hair models, we had no choice but to pack everything with snow and throw it in the fire to clean it out.  We field stripped the Grizzly and jammed snow in every crevice, then stacked the parts in the campfire.  This actually kind of worked.  Brown, muddy water poured out of the gun.  Everything was going well, until we realized the magazine follower was plastic, and starting to deform.  We yanked out the parts and threw them back in a snowbank until they were cool enough to handle.

DSC_0099The gun looked awful.  Every inch of it was stained with soot and ash.  We dropped parts repeatedly as we reassembled it, and ended up getting snow in everything all over again.  The barrel had to be cleared out with a stick half a dozen times.  The follower had melted a bit and the shell lifter had gotten stuck on it, which required beatings with an axe and a socket extension.  We got it free and loaded it back up.

The Dominion Arms Grizzly worked fairly well, firing about half the time.  There was still a fair amount of debris in the trigger pack, so we did what we could.  The tube magazine was a mess and we couldn’t get it to reliably feed anymore, so the gun was down to being a side-loading single shot.  Still a formidable weapon if pressed, so we carried on.  A few dozen trap loads shook enough of the remaining crud loose that the gun became fairly reliable, so we gave it a load of buckshot.

DSC_0106The higher pressure buckshot round fired, but wouldn’t extract.  Rather than slipping off the rim, however, the extractor ripped a chunk of brass right off the shell base.  There could be a point to be made here about the off-axis nature of the Remington extractor path, pulling as it does on one edge of a large hull, but there certainly was no issue with the strength of the extractor itself.  We fed it more buck, and the extractor persisted in ripping the rim off the shell.  This would not do: a battle with our enemies would surely require buckshot.  Drastic technical intervention would be required.

The Baby-Wipening

We took the most high-tech cleaning equipment in our arsenal, baby wipes, and cleaned the chamber and everything we could reach.  We ran a baby wipe through the bore with a stick.  It was unquestionably the most thorough cleaning possible with three baby wipes.  Much crud was taken out of the chamber and lockup notch, which we predicted would significantly improve the gun’s performance.  We congratulated ourselves on being consummate professionals, and prepared to fire again.

DSC_0085Cleaning the chamber had definitely been the right decision: the gun now fed and extracted both trap loads and buck with impressive reliability considering it had been submerged in snow, water, and mud, and the cleansed with fire.  It was now finally cool to the touch, and as it had cooled, the stock screw loosened off somewhat, giving it a rather disconcerting wobble, but it didn’t affect the reliability.

We resigned ourselves to the fact that nothing would get the tube mag working again, owing of course to our decision to set a gun with a plastic follower on fire, and fired trap and buck loads until it was time to break camp, and take our mighty Calibre Cavalry on to the next location.

The Drag Race

One of the best things about the Calibre Army is the stuff in our motor pool, like our 1973 Land Rover.  A Land Rover what, you ask?  No, there is no model name; it predates such modern luxuries as names.  An ex-British Army truck, this one has over 400,000 miles - yes miles - on the clock.  We piled in and led the trek out, presumably singing mighty battle hymns as we went.  The Dominion Arms Grizzly lay in the back.  At first.  Of course the brutal suspension on the old Rover was harsh enough to warrant the gun’s decision to abandon ship, and so we let it ride outside, deciding that it was at least theoretically possible for the gun to catch on the ropes that hold the walls and roof on.  We dragged down the snowy road, which seemed relatively gentle, so we kicked it back into the ditch and dragged it on the rocks and dirt for a while.  Interestingly, the Grizzly saw the sense in leaving the ditch and it did hop back up onto the snow after a while.

DSC_0134The stock was now extremely loose.  We felt that was not unreasonable, all things considered.  Rather luckily, the action had bounced closed after the first fifteen metres or so, and with the action closed, much of the trouble was on the outside of the gun.

Skittering down the snow had had an interesting effect: the staining from the fire had worn off, and the gun actually looked better.  The finish on this generation of Dominion Arms shotguns is impressive: this gun was beaten to hell and back and it looked fairly decent.  The brass bead was still attached, and the only real casualty was the magazine follower.  It seemed fair to stop the Rover and give the Grizzly one last round of shooting before we called it a day.

But when you’re moving vehicles in a warlike column of expeditionary strength, you can’t just stop, even if there’s a gun in the road.  It seemed only right that before we would get the opportunity to shoot the Grizzly again, it would be run over.

And so we drove over it.  Lengthwise.  For a while.

In some ways this was the best thing we did, simply because it really seemed to shake out the last bits of crud from the action.  We now had no worries about firing it, and it felt fairly smooth.  If we hadn’t burned the mag follower, this would have been a fully functional gun, and we’d have just tightened up the stock screw, and kept the gun.  It shot fine, and it still hadn’t been lubed with as much as spit.

The Assassination

But our Dominion Arms Grizzly had no intention of retiring.  It was hell-bent on living its last moments in our bizarre fantasy as a warrior, giving its life to save us.  Would it stop a bullet?

DSC_0157The final battle for the honourable Grizzly was against a Kel-Tec Sub2000, loaded with hot 115 grain 9mm full metal jacketed bullets.  The 18.6 inch barrel piped those bullets up around 1500 feet per second, and the first hit caught the brave Dominion Arms right at the tail of the receiver, shattering the stock.  Truly, the gun was murdered at that moment.

Subsequent rounds pounded the receiver and barrel, putting nasty dents in the receiver but leaving the barrel in surprisingly good shape.  The hits to the receiver halted the action, however, and the brave twelve gauge gave up its life stopping bullets to protect the Calibre Army.  Having thus achieved some semblance of victory, we carefully picked up our empty hulls and wads, extinguished our campfire, and returned to the armoured column to stage an invasion on Tim Hortons, where we appropriated hot chocolate in the name of the revolution.

What We Learned About The Dominion Arms Grizzly

Torture testing guns is controversial.  There’s a very real question about whether you can learn anything from it at all, since the guns are generally subjected to absurd and incomprehensible abuse.  On the other hand, wasn’t that fun?

DSC_0035The Grizzly is a tough machine.  The beating we put on it would have killed any pump shotgun, and in most cases it wouldn’t have taken as long.  The finish impressed us, as the only permanent damage we could inflict on it seemed to be from shooting it with another gun.  We’ve seen a lot of shotguns over the years, and we haven’t often been impressed with the Chinese manufacturing we’ve seen.  As we said in the introduction, even in this production run, our first Grizzly was a flop.  But the replacement was about as tough as you can expect a pump shotgun to be, and the  attention to detail with the brass bead sight and adamantium finish, not to mention the burly steel trigger guard (are you listening Remington?) make this a winner.  If we need to equip our partisan camp with compact, non-restricted shotguns, it’s Grizzlies, all the way.

CPC CONVENTION 2016: THE FIREARMS POLICY PROPOSAL

Having passed the breakout stage of the Conservative Party Convention with a rousing 278 votes to 6, the Firearms Policy Proposal put forth by the party members reads as follows:

1: A Conservative government will not deprive Canadian citizens of their legally acquired firearms.

2: A Conservative government recognizes that civilian firearm ownership is a Canadian Heritage.

3: A Conservative government would streamline firearms classification by adopting the Simplified Classification System.

4: A Conservative government would order a review of firearms-related laws to identify parts of those Acts that have no public safety value.

Firearms Policy Proposal Breakdown

Now, obviously with just four succinct components, these revisions to the party’s policy are not hard to grasp, nor complex. The first component is easily the most clear-cut: That the Conservative party will not support any movement, legislation, or reclassification that would see Canadian gun owners deprived of any of their legally acquired firearms. The term acquired is key here, as it provides protection for those that accidentally allow their license to expire, as it protects firearms that were acquired legally rather than legally possessed. It also could help staunch any potential re-classification or confiscation attempt in the future, as well.

The second component of the policy proposal expands upon this notion by requiring that a Conservative government consider firearms possession to a Canadian Heritage. We know, it sounds somewhat balky to call gun ownership a heritage, but think of it like an old house: Once something been awarded heritage status, it is much more difficult to reduce, remove, or impinge upon it.

Which brings us to the Simplified Classification System. This classification system, drafted and proposed by the Canadian Shooting Sports Association, would substantially change the way firearms are classified in this country by dramatically increasing the degree of transparency and simplicity with which firearms are classified, while simultaneously removing all opportunity for bias or political pressure to effect a firearm’s classification. It would do this by applying the same style of clear-cut and easily understood limitations that currently exist to classify a variety of firearms (most restricted and prohibited firearms, namely) to all firearms.

Prohibited:

(a) an automatic firearm, or

(b) a firearm that is adapted from a rifle or shotgun, whether by sawing, cutting, or any other alteration, and that, as so adapted, is less than 660 mm in length.

Restricted:

(a) a firearm that is not a prohibited firearm,

(b) a handgun, or

(c) a firearm that is designed or adapted to be fired when reduced to a length of less than 660 mm by folding, telescoping, or otherwise.

Non-Restricted:

a firearm that is not a prohibited or restricted firearm.

In short, it would determine all fully automatic firearms, and all rifles or shotguns that have been cut or sawn down to less than 660 millimetres to be prohibited. Restricted firearms would include all handguns, and all firearms that are designed to be fired when reduced to a length of less than 660 millimetres by folding, telescoping or otherwise. Finally, non-restricted firearms would be any firearm that is literally none of the above. In other words, if it isn’t a machine gun, a handgun, hasn’t be chopped down to a length shorter than 660 millimetres, and can’t be made shorter than 660 millimeters by folding or telescoping and fired in that folded condition… it would be a non-restricted firearm. Simple.

The final component in the policy is obviously the most open-ended part here, and would give a future Conservative government the ability to examine and review the efficacy of all firearms-related legislation on the books. The idea here is obvious: Should a given section or act be determined to have no public safety value, it may be removed or rewritten.

What’s Next For The Firearms Policy Proposal?

The breakout stage, which this proposal passed by such a large margin, is simply a fancy term for a smaller vote of interested members. In other words, this morning, the proposal was read and voted on in just one of many similar sessions that went on simultaneously. The particular session this policy was proposed in dealt specifically with matters of public safety and the criminal code, while other sessions going on at the same time dealt with health care, education, and all the other matters of government. As such, any party members particularly interested in a particular section of policy would present themselves at that particular session, and vote on the policies that mattered most to them.

All policies that pass their vote in the breakout stage by a large enough margin are then forwarded to the plenary, where the entirety of the party membership will have an opportunity to hear the policy proposal, and vote on it. This will happen tomorrow at 1:30 pm PST, and the firearms policy proposal outlined above will be voted on in that plenary session. If it passes the vote in the plenary session, it will become the official Conservative Party policy, and as such will dictate a potential Conservative government’s firearms legislation.

What Can You Do?

Simple: Email your Conservative candidate or MP. Let them know that you, as a constituent, support the policy and hope they will as well. And us? We’ll be reporting on the outcome as soon as it is available.

PROPOSED CONSERVATIVE POLICY: FIREARMS OWNERSHIP A CANADIAN HERITAGE

The Conservative Party of Canada is holding their National Convention this weekend in Vancouver, and among the various topics up for debate is that of firearms, and their role in Canadian heritage.

Now, obviously the Conservative Party does not hold sway in the House of Commons at his point in time, but the policies proposed and the outcome of the convention could have huge ramifications for gun owners in Canada. After all, the policies enacted at the convention will make the foundation of the party’s election platform, and may end up leading the way in the next government’s direction. In fact, one of the policy changes surrounding the party’s attitude towards firearms is proving the most newsworthy policy on the docket this weekend.

That policy change? Well, it reads, “A Conservative Government recognizes that civilian firearms ownership is a Canadian Heritage.” Yes. That’s it. That innocuous policy change asking the party to recognize the substantial role firearms have played in Canada’s history has made headline news over all other policy changes and proposals. It has sparked the Huffington Post to write “’Canadian Heritage’ gun ownership… Up For Debate At Tory Convention,” while CityNews and the Toronto Star both reference the policy change exclusively in their own headlines; “Guns as 'Canadian Heritage' and other policies up for debate at Tory convention” and “Tories to debate guns as ‘Canadian heritage’ among other policies,” respectively.

And that’s ridiculous. That firearms played a role in Canada’s history is a statement of fact, not an opinion to be debated. Guns are a part of our country’s heritage, and by virtue of our country’s vast empty wilderness, will continue to be woven into the fabric of daily life for many Canadians. From our Dominion’s early days as one of the nation’s largest fur producers, firearms played a role in protecting and feeding those first Canadian settlers that arrived here long before the meat department at the local Save On. And were it not for the armed Canadian civilian militia rising to the occasion in the War of 1812, we would probably be debating the merits of voting for Hillary, Bernie, or Donald. And even more recently, as the colony grew and settlements moved west towards newly discovered gold strikes, firearms against proved equally important in the hands of the pioneers pushing their way to the Pacific as they were in the hands of the Northwest Mounted Police that accompanied them.

So again, it’s not that notion of firearms being considered a component within our country’s heritage is a policy point that is up for debate; it’s a statement of fact. What this policy change is doing is merely asking the Conservative Party to recognize that fact. And yet, the news media insists in inciting clamorous debate at the mere mention of firearms being enshrined in any language in this country… even if that language recognizes the obvious and undeniable role of firearms in Canada’s past.

And that is, in a word, stupid. It’s also the attitude that pervades so much of the Canadian debate on firearms, and is indicative of the ignorance so commonly displayed by media outlets when it comes time to address firearms. So, it is our job as a media outlet to bring these matters to fore, and clarify them as subject matter experts, just as we would like all gun owners in Canada to do the same when an opportunity to do so presents itself. After all, they say those that forget their history are doomed to repeat it, and we’d rather not have to burn the White House down again.

REMINGTON ADDS LIFETIME WARRANTY

Remington's Canadian representatives, Gravel Agency, forwarded us their latest press release outlining Remington's new limited lifetime warranty. Simply put, the warranty covers all Remington firearms purchased on or after January 1st of this year, but only for as long as the original owner possesses it.

There's not much more to say, except to outline that we have confirmed that Gravel Agency will be honouring this warranty in Canada, so there are no concerns about cross-border warranty discrepancies.

Madison, NC
– Remington Arms Company, LLC, (“Remington”) is proud to announce today that it is offering a limited lifetime warranty on all Remington firearms purchased January 1, 2016 or after. This new limited lifetime warranty offer supports the celebration of Remington’s  200th anniversary in 2016.

“We take pride in crafting dependable, quality firearms designed to last a lifetime in the field or on the range,” said Leland Nichols, SVP & GM Firearms & Accessories.  “We’re proud of the Americans who manufacture our products and want to showcase their skill by offering a limited lifetime warranty on all of our firearms.”

Starting January 1st, 2016, Remington warrants to the original purchaser of a new firearm from Remington that such firearm shall be free from defects in material and workmanship for the duration of time that the purchaser originally owns that firearm.  This warranty allows for repair or replacement of any part/s of the firearm, or replacement of the firearm if un-repairable, so long as all other requirements of the warranty are fulfilled.  All products purchased January 1, 2016 or after are covered by the limited lifetime warranty offer.

Remington does not warrant against any type of defect to the firearm that Remington did not cause, including but not limited to:

  • Failure to provide proper care and maintenance
  • Accidents, abuse, or misuse
  • Barrel obstruction
  • Hand loaded, reloaded, or improper ammunition
  • Unauthorized adjustments, repairs, or modifications
  • Normal wear and tear

BULLET GUIDE

Gun people love to talk about, read about, and generally think about guns. We here at Calibre know this because we’re guilty of it too. We look at them, play with them, take them apart, and dissect their quality, use, and performance ad nauseum. And we do this because they’re fun. They’re interesting. They’re complicated. But they’re also only half of the equation. Because as much as we’re fascinated by guns, at the end of the day they are little more than a metal tube that allows regular people to throw a pointy piece of metal at supersonic speeds. And what the pointy piece of metal does is entirely dependent on how it was made.

And how bullets have been made throughout time has changed immensely as we come to understand both exterior and terminal ballistics. The former term refers to the performance of a projectile as it travels through the air while the latter deals with how the projectile behaves once it has arrived at its target. For hunting purposes, both exterior and terminal ballistics play an important role in projectile selection, while most target shooters will primarily concern themselves with exterior ballistics. And of course, for both parties, cost is always a factor. Here are some of the most popular projectile formats, explained. We’ll begin at the beginning, with an explanation of bullet types.

Full Metal Jacket

The classic “bullet” as most laymen would envision it, the full metal jacket (or FMJ round as it has come to be known) is one of the most common forms of projectiles in existence. This is largely as a result of its wholesale selection by the world’s armies after the Hague Convention of 1899 banned all projectiles that could easily expand or fragment in the body for use in international warfare.

Full metal jacketed bulletsAs its name implies, full metal jacketed bullets are comprised of two components: a soft lead core, and a (usually) copper jacket that surrounds it. The jacket may completely cover the bullet, or it may leave the lead base exposed, but it always covers the tip of the bullet. This keeps the bullet from flattening upon impact with a softer target, which in turn prevents the bullet from delivering all its energy to the target, making them an unacceptable choice for hunting.

However, while their terminal ballistics may preclude their use in most practical situations, their exterior ballistics are typically excellent. In the case of most modern full metal jacketed rifle projectiles, the bullet is sharply conical in shape and thus referred to as a “spitzer” bullet. Initially developed by the Germans (spitzer being the German word for “pointed”) this shape greatly increases the ballistic coefficient of the projectile, which is nothing more than a fancy way of saying the bullet experiences less drag as it passes through the air. As a result, these rounds are typically capable of travelling faster and farther than many others, especially when paired with a boat-tailed bullet base, a combination usually identified as FMJBT.

Thanks to their widespread military use, FMJ and FMJBT bullets are readily available and typically can be some of the cheapest projectiles to purchase. Although completely unacceptable and, in fact, illegal for hunting use, their combination of high accuracy and low cost make them the target shooter’s choice.

Soft Point

One of the oldest rounds in existence, the soft-point bullet was developed shortly after the creation of cordite, when it was discovered that the increased velocities allowed by this new propellant would strip lead from a bare lead bullet as it travelled down the barrel. By jacketing the lead bullet in copper, the bullet better retained its mass through the firing process, but still flattened out or mushroomed upon impact.

Soft-tipped bullets The design of the soft point bullet is similar to that of the full metal jacketed bullet, with one obvious exception: the lead core of the bullet remains exposed at the bullet’s tip. Remembering Newton’s third law, which states there must be an equal and opposite reaction to every action, when a bullet strikes a target the target exerts pressure on front of the bullet as the projectile proceeds forward. In the case of a game animal, this pressure is hydraulic in nature, and when combined with the soft lead tip of an SP bullet, allows the hydraulic pressure of the bullet’s impact to be directed into the lead core of the bullet. The lead nose then flattens out and expands, slowing the bullet’s travel, and imparting more energy on the target. This includes bullets known as soft point, or SP bullets, as well as semi-jacketed soft-point (SJSP) or jacketed soft-point (JSP). For all intents and purposes these terms can be used interchangeably.

The external ballistics of soft point bullets vary somewhat. That is mostly because there are two relatively distinct versions of the soft-pointed bullet. One, now common on the commercial rifle ammunition market, draws the lead tip to a point, while the other simply flattens off at the end of the jacket. Obviously pointier bullets move through the air more easily, but the small lead tip is easily deformed and can induce inconsistent accuracy at long range, while the flattened tip bullets create more drag in the air but expand slightly faster.
As a relatively old technology that’s been around forever, soft-pointed bullets are some of the cheapest ammunition variants found. However, their age and generally compromised performance at both ends also means they are not commonly found as bare bullets for reloading, as hunters are far more likely to opt for a more modern bullet design while target shooters still prefer FMJ projectiles.

Hollow Point

One of the most discussed and controversial bullet designs in existence, the hollow point, or HP bullet is designed to impart maximum energy to the target as rapidly as possible. A term bandied about in movies, video games, and TV shows alike, there’s plenty of rumours surrounding restrictions on the purchase and use of hollow point ammunition in Canada, but suffice to say they remain nothing more than that: rumours. To put it bluntly, hollow point ammunition is entirely legal.

hollow pointsHollow point ammunition takes the logic behind soft pointed projectiles a step further, compressing the lead at the bullet’s tip, and developing a small void or divot at the nose of the bullet. This increases the amount of surface area available for that aforementioned hydraulic pressure to act upon and allows for more rapid bullet expansion. As a result, hollow point bullets do not penetrate as deeply as other styles of bullet but impart all their energy immediately upon reaching the target. This makes them exceptionally effective on small to medium-size game where penetration need not be overly deep.

However, while their terminal performance is very good, their external ballistics leave a lot to be desired. With a hollowed out area flying through the air, they not only have expectedly poor ballistic coefficient figures, they’re also frequently poorly balanced and susceptible to straying off course. Also, depending on the round and the firearm, there can be feeding issues with some hollow pointed ammunition varieties, as bullet manufacturers try to maintain the same bullet weight while creating a void in the bullet’s nose. This usually means the bullet’s nose is flared out excessively, and is less rounded near the case mouth, right where it may meet the feed ramp.

Popular, well-tested, and relatively easy to make, hollow point bullets vary in price dramatically due to their wide range of use. Some handgun-calibre hollow point ammunition varieties intended for potential self-defence work can be quite expensive, as manufacturers strive to enforce the most stringent quality controls on those rounds. For other rounds, such as popular lever gun calibres, hollow point ammunition can be quite affordable... and a very sensible choice given the restrictions enforced on bullet types by a tube magazine.

Plastic Tip

A relatively new invention, plastic or “ballistic” tipped bullets don’t yet have the ubiquitous category name that the preceding bullet styles did, but are instead sold under a myriad of trademarked brands, such as Nosler’s Ballistic Tip, Hornady’s SST and Barnes’ TSX. These bullets have been designed to combine the terminal performance of a hollow point with the external ballistics of a traditional spitzer-style full metal jacketed projectile.

Plastic-tipped bulletsThese bullets incorporate a hollow point-like cavity in the nose of the bullet with caps that void off with a pointed plastic insert. The insert is intended to serve as a wedge upon impact, and usually tapers downward to increase its effectiveness in flaring the tip of the bullet as it is pushed back into the cavity. Some users report that these ballistic tip bullets open even faster than conventional hollow points as a result, while retaining more mass, meaning that while they work very well for medium-sized, thinner-skinned game but may lack the penetrating ability required for larger, tougher game. That said, their mass retention is oftentimes so good that calibre selection can be crucial to avoid creating too large of a wound path.

Externally, being very well shaped and usually well balanced, these bullets are typically the most accurate projectiles suitable for hunting.

Having become wildly popular among manufacturers, the plastic tipped bullet has become a staple in the hunting community, but doesn’t necessarily come cheap. Having assumed it’s place atop most manufacturer’s product lines, most plastic tipped variants carry similarly premium price tags, making it some of the more expensive ammunition available.

Open Tip Match

One small and obscure category of bullet is the open tip match round. Championed by the famous and highly sought after Sierra MatchKing bullet, this particular style of bullet was created specifically to be fired from the 7.62 NATO marksman’s rifles used in service rifle competitions, and as such was available in 168 grain, .30-calibre only. It’s design has since been adapted to other calibres as well.

Although it may look like a strangely proportioned take on the hollow point’s design, with a smooth jacket terminating near the nose and leaving what appears to be a cavity in the internal material, the open tipped match bullet is anything but. That small hole at the bullet’s tip doesn’t give way to a cavity within the lead core but actually opens into a far larger cavity within the jacket itself. Having not been designed for use against anything other than paper targets at Camp Perry and other competitive settings, it is not intended for any other uses.

Open tipped match bulletLengthened to the extreme in order to make it as slippery as possible, the open tipped bullet’s lead core actually only occupies roughly 80% of the bullet’s jacket, leaving the top portion of the nose completely empty. This has two effects on the bullet’s external ballistics. First, it allows for a longer overall length and more smoothly radiused conical shape at the same weight, lending the bullet a superior ballistic coefficient. Secondly, as the bullet moves forward, this pocket fills with air, and creates a high pressure zone at the bullet’s tip. Similar to the effect caused by a golf ball’s dimples, this high pressure zone acts as a cushion, adding stability and decreasing drag. It also has ramifications in the manufacturing process that allows for more precise production and lower tolerances.

Being a product with a very specific market that also sees quite a lot of demand, match-grade open tipped bullets are considerably more expensive than many other formats of projectile. Also, they are far more commonly available in NATO standardized calibres such as .30 and .224, and although they are certainly manufactured for numerous other calibres, those other calibres can be substantially harder to find.

Construction

The tip of the bullet plays an obvious role in the round’s effectiveness and accuracy. But of particular importance to hunters, how a rifle bullet’s copper jacket and lead core are constructed and joined will play a tremendous role in how the bullet performs once it has arrived at its target. And to this end there are a few different mechanisms used by most commercial manufacturers to promote better terminal ballistic performance.

Bonded Core Bullet

As propellant became more and more efficient at pushing bullets ever faster, it became obvious that ensuring that a bullet’s lead core and copper jacket did not separate upon impact would become a priority, as doing so meant a significant reduction in bullet mass and energy. Obviously the easiest way to accomplish this is to use mechanisms that mechanically and or chemically adhere the copper jacket to the lead core. The result is what’s known as a bonded bullet.

One method of retaining the lead core within the copper jacket is to simply glue them together. Of course, that is a gross oversimplification of the process and chemicals involves, as most actually use some form of electro-chemical reaction between a specifically selected copper alloy used for the jacket and a specific lead alloy for the core. Others use the application of electricity to essentially solder, or as some manufacturers refer to it, weld the core and jacket together.

In some cases, manufacturers use a mechanical system to bond the bullet core and jacket together. In many cases this may be as simple a device as a crimped cannelure around the bullet. This is a pressed-in serration that’s applied to the assembled bullet that serves two purposes. First, and perhaps foremost, it reduces the diameter of the bullet and allows the case to be crimped around it. This significantly increases the durability of ammunition. Secondly, it embeds the copper jacket into the lead core and provides a degree of mechanical grip between the two components. In many hollow pointed projectiles, the cannelure serves as a sort of limiting factor for the bullet’s expansion; a belt of sorts to keep the round from expanding too much.

But in many cases, manufacturers have used other methods of mechanically ensuring the core remains encased by the jacket, such as using varied thicknesses of jacket. Remington’s Core-Lokt ammunition, for example, uses a jacket that has a cavity that gets noticeably wider at the bullet’s base. As a result, the lead core is kept from ejecting forward out of the jacket by the jacket’s narrowing cavity. Hornady’s Interlock system uses an additional ring formed into the lower portion of the jacket halfway between the base of the bullet and the cannelure. This ring protrudes into the lead core and again, keeps it from ejecting forward and coming free of the jacket.

Internally Divided Bullet

Another method of ensuring the bullet’s expansion and weight retention is strictly controlled is to divide the load core into sections. This is accomplished by dividing the front and rear half of the bullet’s lead core with a dam that is integral to the jacket. In other words, instead of a single cavity within the jacket, these bullets have two; a front and a rear cavity. The idea behind this is that the nose cavity, usually capped off with a soft point, expands like a conventional bullet while the capped rear cavity ensures solid penetration. Even if the entire lead core is lost from the nose cavity, the rear component will continue forward as an FMJ round.

Of course, these are complex bullets compared to most, they are harder to manufacture and thus amongst the most expensive rounds available. Furthermore, although their combination of expansion and penetration is very effective on both large and small game, they are considered by many to be superfluous when used on most small to mid-size game when conventional bonded or even unbonded soft points perform adequately.

The downside to bullets designed in this man     ner is both their prohibitive cost and their relative inconsistency. By virtue of essentially making two bullets in one, it’s not uncommon for the lead cavities within to be slightly different, which throws off accuracy. Instead of having a single mass of lead that’s consistent from one round to the next, there are two lead masses within each bullet that must be consistent with both one another, and consistent with each additional round. Also, since the front cavity on most is quite small but expands very quickly, a hunter is far more likely to find the front lead core has separated from the jacket in one of these divided bullets than a traditional or bonded soft point.

Monolithic and Solid Bullet

Lead has been the go-to material for the majority of most bullets’ construction since the dawn of time because it’s cheap and it’s heavy. And one of the biggest complaints with lead bullets has been their performance against some of the toughest and largest animals on earth. Susceptible to damage from heavy tissue and bone mass, lead projectiles can struggle to find the balance between penetration and expansion in very large animals, as a bullet that expands too much won’t penetrate enough while one that does runs the risk of striking bone and fragmenting; losing energy and effectiveness.

monolithic bullets One solution to this problem is to use a solid bullet. These are, not surprisingly, solid. No jacket, no lead core, just one single chunk of homogenous metal flying through the air. Typically made of either brass or copper, they are far more resilient than a conventional lead bullet, and provide good expansion and incredible penetration. If you needed to hunt a tyrannosaur, this is what you’d use. They penetrate reliably and lose no weight as they expand.

And they do have the propensity to be quite accurate. However, the notion that their solid mass somehow makes them superlatively accurate isn’t entirely deserved; you’ll note most match shooters obtain excellent results with lead-cored bullets. This is because while solid bullets can be made to more exacting tolerances and are free of variables such as errant jacket concentricity (in which a bullet’s jacket isn’t a uniform thickness around the entirety of the bullet), the materials they are constructed from are not as dense as lead. So, in order to even come to the same weight, solid bullets must be significantly longer, and as a result demand a faster twist barrel than a conventional bullet. And even although they have been lengthened as much as possible, most solid bullets remain slightly less heavy than their lead counterparts. So, while their slippery shapes (many of which are impossible to replicate in a conventional lead bullet) may make them slightly more efficient at passing through the air, their lack of mass makes them slightly less stable, making the accuracy argument largely a wash.

Obviously, as the entire bullet is made from the same material, solid, monolithic, or monometal bullets cannot be had in a soft point variety; there are only standard spitzer bullets, and hollow points. And equally obvious is that they won’t come cheap. Each bullet is literally machined, taking of far more time on the production line, and far more costly materials... remember again why lead was so popular? Thankfully though, while many solid bullets work very well on Canadian game, they are typically not as called for on this continent as they would be somewhere like Africa. Or the Jurassic period.

DERYA GIVEAWAY TODAY!

Well, the first day of Spring has come and gone and that must mean it's time for our bright red shotgun to leave the nest. We'll be using a random number generator to give us a grand prize winner from any of the past seven weekly winners at noon pacific time, but before that, we'd like to congratulate our weekly winners:

Week 1: Dave from Victoria, BC.

Week 2: Richard from Comox, BC.

Week 3: Frank from Edmonton, AB

Week 4: Eric from Winnipeg, MB

Week 5: Bassel from Edmonton, AB

Week 6: Jonathan from Keswick, ON

Week 7: Jakub from Ajax, ON

Each of those lucky devils took home $50 and a free Calibre shirt of their choosing, and one of them will be lucky enough to lay claim to the bright red Derya Mk10 shotgun seen in the upcoming issue of Calibre; an $1100 value!

FEAST FOR THE EYES FRIDAY: GUNMAKING EDITION

For the mechanically inclined (or at least, interested), there are few things that lend themselves so well to high-quality video production as gunkaprocesses. Machines working at high speed, slowed down to a manageable visual framerate, macro shots showing the effects of a rasp’s effort, the vivid colour of a torch’s flame… it’s all great eye candy.

But in stumbling around the reams of video available on Youtube, we came across two similar videos from a couple familiar faces: Holland & Holland, and Beretta. Each video showcases the methodology involved in the making of both of these companies fine double-barreled shotguns in a truly artful form, but both videos also showcase the equally masterful, but equally opposite manner in which they build their guns.

As the Beretta video showcases, in the production of their fine SO-series of sidelock over-under guns, production hinges (no pun intended) on the marriage of new-world manufacturing methods including cold hammer forging barrels and five-axis CNC machining to old-world craftsmanship. It makes sense as Beretta themselves represent a similar marriage; as the world's oldest manufacturing company but one that still produces millions of thoroughly modern firearms for thoroughly modern customers. With a manufacturing history that started in 1526 with the manufacture of an order of gun barrels for the Arsenal of Venice, Beretta still today maintains a variety of military contracts, and as the video demonstrates they have obviously embraced modern technology without letting go of their storied past.

Holland & Holland on the other hand is English gunmaking at its finest. Although vastly newer, Holland & Holland was created with the express purpose of providing the discerning English shooter and hunter with the absolute best gun available, but the company's founder, Harris Holland, refused to follow in the footsteps of England's other storied gunmakers to achieve that goal. Today, Holland & Holland holds 51 patents; more than any other English gunmaker. But unlike Beretta, Holland & Holland's creativity is founded in the company's literal roots, as the various generations of Holland & Holland gunmakers use the familiar old ways to improve upon their famous double gun offerings.

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CBC

A city Councillor Tweets a single photo of two new pistols. He's proud to have them, just as the owner of a new dirt bike, snowmobile, or sports car would be proud. The Councillor is has gone through the multiple character references, psychological history check, safety tests, and daily criminal record checks required to obtain and maintain a restricted firearm licence. The acquisition of the pistols in question, and their very transport to the Councillor's home was approved by our national police force.

And yet, due to the tragic murder of a young man some days before, the Councillor's decision to share his excitement with those that choose to follow his social media efforts inspires you to question the validity of his mere sharing of a photo; somehow attempting to draw parallels and links between the Councillor's photo and the murder of the young man. And not only do you do this once, but thrice, attempting to stoke the fires of discord between the pro- and anti-gun camps in both print and with a crude and biased video interview... all the while distracting from the young man's untimely passing and conflating the issuing of the gang violence that claimed his life and the lives of so many others in the area with the matter of legal gun ownership.

This does an obvious dis-service to the general public, and furthermore, should offend those of us taxpayers that fund the CBC in an effort to maintain an unbiased news source with the public's best interests at heart. But it gets worse. Because this coverage highlights hypocritical nature of the CBC's new reportage in a way that no other news story has, at least not in recent memory.

During the last election cycle, the CBC all but publicly endorsed our current Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, even in light of Prime Minister Trudeau's self-admitted history of smoking marijuana. Now, in recent times this has become a legal pass time, with many using items like Blessed CBD oil to help themselves with medical needs. However, marijuana, it should be noted, comprises the majority of Canada's drug trade. And it is that same drug trade that gives rise to the sort of gang violence seen on Ottawa's beleaguered Jasmine Crescent.

And although Trudeau promises to legalize the still-illicit narcotic in an effort to curb the violence associated with its distribution, there can be no denying that his consumption of the drug literally contributed to that illegal industry to which our nation owes the majority of its serious violent crime, just as his public admission thereof has contributed to the stigma that its consumption is harmless. It's obvious within the USA medical marijuana is beneficial in ways, from improving patients lives, to also decreasing the illicit drug trade with legal products such as this thc infused e liquid and similar marijuana items. So it's no wonder Trudeau is also wanting legalization. In fact, Trudeau's rise to power and comments on marijuana have created such a spike in its consumption that our own police chiefs have seen fit to publish a reminder that it remains, in fact, illegal as of current. However, with so many positive outcomes from medical marijuana studies in America, it would seem unfair for Canada to keep that option off the table for many patients with various illnesses. Soon enough, citizens will be searching for medical marijuanas doctor near me to seek assistance when it comes to managing their illnesses. As long as doctors and facilities stick to government guidelines and rules to make sure it is a safe environment for patients to enter, it should be okay to operate. Medical companies can bring in cannabis hazardous waste experts to handle and dispose of any excess or related waste that must be cared for properly.

And yet, as we see studies indicating marijuana use is at an all-time high (no pun intended) we find the CBC linking gang violence not to a corollary rise in gang activity but rather to... a city Councillor's decision to post a photo of two pistols?

So to the CBC, from gun owners across the country, I implore you: Stop being part of the problem. Stop chasing the easy pageviews, the easy rhetoric, the easy opinions that the gun control debate brings. And start being part of the solution.

Because Councillor Jody Mitic deserves better. And because every victim of drug-related and gang violence deserves better.

BRNO 7.5 FK FIELD PISTOL: CANADA BOUND?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_DLohiGl0Y

Although first shown in prototype form at the 2015 IWA show, Brno took the wraps off a finished, civilian-market ready Field Pistol at this year’s IWA show, in Nuremburg, Germany.

Brno 7.5 FK Field Pistol    So what is the Field Pistol? It’s a long-slide pistol incorporating CZ-75 style controls with a unique calibre (more on that later) and some obvious and interesting design features. For example, while the slide and rail fitment is very CZ-75, the barrel is held in place by a screw-in barrel bushing, which should increase accuracy. Likewise, the sights are very unique, and feature a skeletonized rear sight with an aperture. The front sight is placed in the aperture to obtain a sight picture, while the skeletonized sight assembly allow the shooter to find the front sight when it would otherwise be obscured by the sight.

Brno 7.5 FK Field PistolBut the biggest feature is inside the steel frame’s full-length dust cover. Where a normal recoil spring and guide rod would be located, the Field Pistol features a unique recoil mitigation system involving a semi-floating counter mass that supposedly reduced muzzle rise and gives the pistol its unique shape. Details are scarce on how it exactly works, but according to Brno it gives the admittedly heavy 3-pound Field Pistol the recoil impulse of a 40 S&W.

Brno 7.5 FK Field PistolSo why is that important? Because the Field Pistol shoots one cartridge: Brno’s proprietary bottlenecked 7.5 FK pistol round. With bullet weights between 98 and 103 grains and muzzle velocities of around 2,000 feet per second, it largely mimics the ballistics and energy of a .44 Mag. In fact, the 7.5 FK is so powerful that Brno claims it retains enough energy to defeat Class IIIA soft armour at 100 meters. Perhaps even more impressively? Brno also claims that the 7.5 FK Field Pistol will also shoot 1.5” groups at that distance, too… making this one seriously accurate handgun.

Brno 7.5 FK Field PistolNow, with a 6” barrel, the 7.5 FK Field Pistol should breeze through our firearm classification system easily enough. Furthermore, being produced in the Czech Republic means the 7.5 FK Field Pistol will be intriguing to Canadian distributors that are looking for alternatives to the US-dollar, US-produced market they’re used to dealing with. The only downside? That proprietary round. Although the pistol will probably be relatively expensive regardless of the currency exchange (it is, remember, one of the most powerful semi-auto pistols on the market) the ammo may force it into the realm of “often fondled, rarely shot” but similarly exotic pistols chambered in things like .454 Casull and .460 S&W, .50 AE, and to a lesser degree, 10mm. But nonetheless, we hope to see it here at some point!

Brno 7.5 FK Field Pistol