The United States is the single largest civilian firearm market on earth. And within that market, one rifle reigns supreme: The AR-15. And for good reason. It's pretty much everything you could possibly want in an everyman's rifle. Available in everything from coyote to moose calibres, weighing no more than your average bolt-action rifle, having less felt recoil, providing superb accuracy, and highly modular, it probably is the best rifle of the 21st century. And not surprisingly, because of all that popularity, it's cheap too.
As a result of this momentum, the majority of North America's rifle manufacturers have been relatively recalcitrant to develop new designs that depart from the AR-15 platform, lest they give up ground to a competitor. Hence, we Canadians are often forced to look abroad or to niche markets to find a similarly modern semi-automatic rifle, and oftentimes the things we find end up costing far more than an AR-15 ever would. The Bushmaster ACR DMR is one such rifle.
Created by firearms accessory titan Magpul and initially known as the Masada before being licensed to Bushmaster, the ACR has its roots in the early years of the 21st century; when large firearms manufacturers were still optimistic that the venerable M4 would be replaced by a more modern rifle. But, like the AR-15 in the civilian world, the M4 was (and remains) too deeply ingrained in the military machine to be uprooted.
As a result the ACR and its chief competitor, the FN SCAR, were forced to turn to smaller procurement markets for their success… special operations and foreign forces. Unfortunately for Bushmaster though, the SCAR became the preferred non-M4-pattern rifle of most US special operations forces, while the ACR had to go all the way to Poland to find success with the Polish Military Intelligence Service known as the Służba Wywiadu Wojskowego, or SWW. There, the ACR has been so well loved that the Polish firearms manufacturer Radom has commissioned a new ACR-based modular rifle known as the Radom MSBS, for issue to all members of the Polish military.
Unfortunately, the relative lack of military success has had a detrimental effect on the amount of attention and expenditure lavished on the ACR, and what was once supposed to be an extensive family of rifles with numerous caliber conversion kits has turned into just a handful of models carrying relatively large price tags due to their rarity. And for Canadians, the frustration has been two-fold, as the ACR platform is non-restricted but rifle availability was limited to models with 16" barrels. As a result all ACRs were restricted upon import due to their barrel length.
That meant anyone desiring to actually own a non-restricted ACR needed to get a new barrel fitted by a Canadian gunsmith; a relatively time-consuming and expensive process. Which is precisely why the debut of the Bushmaster ACR DMR, with a factory-fitted 18.5" barrel, was so compelling when it broke cover in 2014. Unfortunately, again the preference for the AR-15 and M4 pattern of rifles impeded the ACR's progress, and a combination of war efforts in the Middle East and a civilian penchant for ever-more AR-15s conspired to keep the ACR DMR out of production until the fourth quarter of 2016. But it's here now.
What is the ACR DMR?
For those unfamiliar, the ACR is a piston-driven highly modular rifle platform utilizing conventional STANAG-pattern magazines, and offering almost unparalleled ambidexterity and flexibility. The rifle itself is comprised of five major components: The stock, fire control group, receiver, handguard, and barrel. Unlike the AR-15, all of these components can be replaced with any other available component in mere seconds with no tools. The receiver, stock, fire control group and handguard are all retained with simple push pins while the barrel is secured to the receiver by a threaded collar. Even torqueing the barrel in place requires no tools, as the barrels incorporate integral folding handles on the threaded collar, which itself is prevented from backing out by a built-in ratcheting system.
In the past ACRs have been available with either a fixed or folding stock, both of which incorporate particularly brilliantly adjustable cheek risers, while the latter also adjusts for length of pull. The ACR DMR, however, uses a Magpul PRS2 stock specifically designed for the ACR. With threaded adjustments for both length of pull and comb height, this stock allows for fine adjustment in both directions, but sadly does not incorporate the conventional PRS stock's railed lower portion; precluding the use of a stock-supporting monopod.
Moving forward, the ACR DMR borrows both the fire control group and receiver components from the standard ACR, but fills the former with a Super ACR trigger from Geissele Automatics. A very smooth two-stage trigger with listed pull weights of 2.5 pounds for the first stage, and 2 pounds for the second (for a total pull weight of 4.5 pounds), beyond being a boon to accuracy this trigger's inclusion in the ACR DMR right out of the box is not an insignificant feature: If you were to buy one separately you should expect to pay $400 for the privilege!
Which brings us to the ACR DMR's most important feature; the barrel. Measuring 18.5" long, this wonderful piece of forged stainless steel is notable for a few different reasons, the most important of which is obviously its fulfillment of the Canadian firearms act's requirement that non-restricted semi-automatic rifles possess a minimum barrel length of 18.5 inches.
But there's more to it than that. First off, it's heavy… almost ridiculously so. Measuring 0.98" across from the breech to the op rod guide, 0.90" to 0.85" between the op rod guide and the gas block, and 0.73" from the gas block to the muzzle device it is one of the heaviest barrel profiles you'll find on such a rifle. Also, although the bolt is marked "multical," that beefy barrel is chambered in 5.56 NATO. The rifling is cut to match the current standard for most 5.56 NATO rifles, with a 1-in-7 inch twist rate.
All the aforementioned components can be disassembled quickly, and with no tools. The two pins located where the stock joins the rifle hold the receiver and fire control group to the stock. Pull the topmost pin and the receiver and barrel assembly hinge downward like an AR-15's upper receiver. Slide the lower pin out and the stock can be lifted free. Ahead of the magazine well, the front take down pin secures the fire control group to the upper receiver and barrel, and just ahead of that pin is the pin that secures the handguard to the upper receiver. Pulling that pin and removing the handguard reveals the handle on the barrel that must be pulled down and rotated to unthread the barrel nut and release the barrel. Overall, it's brilliantly designed.
ACR DMR First Impressions
The ACR DMR arrives, like so many other premium Bushmaster firearms, in a relatively staid Bushmaster box containing (in grand Russian nesting doll fashion) a Bushmaster-branded Flambeau rifle case. And inside that is the ACR DMR, safely bagged in plastic, the ubiquitous and always unloved cable rifle lock, and one 5-round Magpul Pmag.
And undoubtedly, the first thing anyone will notice when they pull the DMR out of its case is the overall weight of the thing. Out of the box, sans sling, optic, magazine and ammunition, our test rifle tipped the scales at ten pounds even. As pictured here, with a Bushnell Elite Tactical 1-8.5x24mm optic in an American Defense Manufacturing Recon mount, and a Blue Force Gear VCAS sling, the entire thing weighs 12.5 pounds; definitely on the portlier side of things.
Handling the ACR DMR will feel oddly familiar to anyone that's spend much time behind an AR-15; the pistol grip, safety, and overall dimensions being somewhat similar. But we say oddly because while it feels akin to an AR-15 when you're behind it, there's a few features that we find dramatically improve upon the AR-15 experience. First and foremost is the charging handle. Positioned forward and high on the action like a SCAR's, but being both non-reciprocating and capable of functioning as a forward assist due to its clever design, it comes easily to hand and is easier to work than an AR-15's charging handle. Furthermore, swapping it from one side to another is as easy as depressing a latch atop the rifle with the nose of a bullet, pulling the handle out and re-inserting it from the other side. We just wish the handle itself were slightly larger.
Likewise, we also love the controls for their similarly well-thought out nature. The bolt release is a pair of paddles on the front of the trigger guard; easily depressed by either the trigger finger or a thumb upon reloading. The magazine release is both oversized and ambidextrous. Rounding out the lefty-friendly nature of the ACR is an ambidextrous safety.
Not surprisingly, for a rifle that's predicated on the notions of flexibility, ambidexterity, and modularity, the ACR DMR also features an almost ridiculous number of small, but useful additional features. First off, the pistol grip contains a secure CR123 battery storage tube. The grip panels cast into the pistol grip and magazine well are actually tiny Magpul logos superimposed on a pebbled texture and are wonderfully grippy. The gas cylinder is capped by a regulator that allows the used to select the appropriate gas setting for unsuppressed or suppressed operation (dare to dream, right). And the rifle has no less than seven sling points baked into its design; five quick-release sling points and two fixed sling points on the stock that can be swapped from one side to the other as the owner sees fit. Interestingly though, on our test rifle, the two quick-release sling points fitted to the fore-end were installed backwards; a problem easily rectified with five minutes and an allen wrench.
Likewise, we also must mention that although the charging handle is in a fantastic position in terms of manipulation and leverage, it does travel through a not insubstantial amount of space on the handguard. In fact, we had initially mounted our optic in a standard-style mount, but the forward scope mount clamp did not allow enough room for us to cycle the charging handle fully rearward. Also, although we've not installed any such devices, we suspect things like PEQ-15s, lasers, and lights would all restrict either access to, or movement of the charging handle.
Shooting the ACR DMR
Now, it's at this point that we must point out that this is a non-restricted black rifle, which already makes it one in a relatively small subset of rifles, but the ACR goes even farther by being a very specialized rifle; it isn't called a DMR for nothing. This is intended to be used in the role of a designated marksman's rifle. Hence the heavy, but accurate barrel and heavy, but adjustable stock. We did most of our testing off either a lead sled when trying to test the rifle's mechanical accuracy and off a shooting bag for the rest of our testing. It's not something you're going to want to run around doing drills with and holding in an offhand position for long.
But if you're looking for something that will allow you to take advantage of the limitless ranges at which you can shoot on Crown land… well, this may be your rifle. Perched atop our well-seasoned Vertx range bag (which makes an excellent rifle rest, by the way) the ACR DMR was a treat to shoot. The Magpul PRS is a fantastic piece of equipment, and with its adjustable length of pull and comb height allowing us to get comfortable behind the gun, we were able to string together groups of comparable size to those that we shot off the lead sled. And that's a good indication of the rifle's sort of intrinsic performance insofar as how well it marries man and machine.
Furthermore, the level of comfort the rifle provides and its weight both make shooting not only easy, but pleasant. Although we (sadly) can't stick the appropriate AAC suppressor on the AAC 51T flash hider/suppressor mount, the 18" barrel does a reasonable job of quelling as much of the 5.56's report as possible… and moves it farther from the shooter's ears. The Geissele trigger is, in a word, excellent. We've always been partial to good two-stage triggers, and this is a good one; there's a tiny bit of creep at the beginning of the second stage but it's barely noticeable and will probably go away with more use. The pull weight is ideal. The first stage is light but positive; you know you're pulling through it and the beginning of the second stage is definitely not something you'll notice. In other words, it's like all good two-stage triggers in that it takes a small degree of effort to get through the first stage, and a similar amount of effort to break the second stage. And the reset is very positive, and long enough to get you right back to the same position as your first shot was taken from… and as we all know, consistency is the key to accuracy. On the other end side of the coin, the trigger's not so light nor effortless that we were ever concerned that we'd pull a shot off before we expected it; there's a reason 4.5 pounds is generally considered the sweet spot for accurate but practical trigger weights.
Speaking of weights, there definitely an upside to the rifle's not insubstantial weight. Weighing as much as a .308 but only shooting 5.56 means there's almost no recoil, so watching bullet trace and impact is much easier than on a lighter rifle, which in turn means more accuracy.
Overall, the impression of shooting the ACR DMR is one of capability; the rifle's so easy to set up and shoot that you can concentrate on your shooting technique. You needn't adopt an unnatural position to get behind the gun. You needn't break your shooting position to load the next round. You needn't anticipate any significant recoil. You don't even need to remove your hand from the grip to operate any of the controls, regardless of if you're right- or left-handed. Simply concentrate on breathing, trigger control, and sight picture.
In terms of reliability and performance, the ACR has proven to be one of the most reliable rifles we've ever tested; it's literally never not worked. Now, in all fairness, we've had other rifles that have proven to be 100% reliable… but we've never shot a rifle with as many different varieties of ammunition or magazines as we have the ACR DMR.
We've also never shot a rifle in any many varied conditions as this rifle. From 10 degrees above zero and dry to -15 and snowing, it's fed no less than 8 different kinds of magazines through it, with well over a dozen different kinds of .223 and 5.56 ammunition and it's done it everywhere from clean gun club shooting benches to dirty, muddy, snowy back roads. So when you consider all those variables, it's pretty impressive. In the two short months that we've been testing it, the beefy Bushmaster has given us utter confidence in its reliability, and we expect it to continue to do so.
But if we're honest, we expected as much from the ACR DMR; being a premium piston-drive gun there's no reason to think it'd ever choke. But the ACR doesn't have the best reputation for accuracy. Due to the nature of its quick-change barrel system, it's hard to manufacture such a rifle on a large scale and do so with a high degree of accuracy, and most ACRs are known for being "battlefield accurate." In other words, 2-4 MOA, or perhaps slightly better. The DMR is not like other ACRs though, evidently.
Although accuracy with many of the bulk ammunition varieties typically ran around 2 MOA, the DMR responded very well to ammunition that makes use of the barrel's fast twist rate. Longer, heavier bullets ranging in weight from 69- to 77-grains typically worked well, as did the newer forms of factory ammunition specifically directed at semi-automatic rifles with faster twist barrels, like Barnes' lead-free 52-grain zinc-core RangeAR ammunition.
Conclusion
The Bushmaster ACR DMR is many things. Accurate, reliable, heavy, and expensive. But it's also rare. As previously discussed, ACRs remain a relatively uncommon rifle in all circles, and with only 100 ACR DMRs having come to Canada in the first shipment these particular rifles are unlikely to ever become common.
And although Bushmaster's importer, Gravel Agency, is looking forward to additional shipments throughout 2017, the combination of the rifle's niche appeal and $3,399 retail price relegate this rifle to somewhat exotic status.
But if you happen to be in the market for something non-restricted, that's not only capable of, but rather particularly well suited to longer range shooting, this is a great rifle. So great, in fact, that we lightened our own wallet in order to purchase the rifle pictured here. That makes it 99 out there and counting for now...
CZ SHADOW 2: HOT ROD, COOL PRICE
The CZ Shadow 2: Hands-on
At Calibre, sometimes we get a gun sent to us which generates more interest than we expect. Other times, less interest. Usually this is a function of when the release date is, and how new or innovative the idea is, and whether the gun is non-restricted. Non-restricted guns that have just been announced, with a really interesting feature set, generally arouse the magazine-reading public. Restricted guns that are an incremental improvement on past guns, which have been known about for months, usually have a more subdued impact. And usually we’re pretty good at predicting this effect.
When we took the CZ Shadow 2 to the range for the first time, a casual social media post turned into an on-the-spot mobbing as the post was shared (by notable CZ shooter Rob Engh, which no doubt had an effect) in real time, and then we hardly got to shoot it for the rest of the evening, because everyone wanted to pose with it for pictures.
We thought we were pretty good at predicting buzz, but man, we really did not see that coming.
Česká zbrojovka Uherský Brod, far more popularly known as CZ for reasons we can’t explain, launched the Shadow 2 at the German arms expo IWA in March of this year as the company’s IPSC (that’s International Practical Shooting Confederation, and one of Canada’s most popular handgun sports) Production class gun, the second generation of the extremely successful CZ SP-01 Shadow. The original Shadow was a refined CZ-75, which itself is a traditional double action steel 9mm service pistol originally built in 1975 and popular among military and police organizations worldwide, although it never really took off in the West, where it faced stiff competition from the 1911 in the US, and the Browning Hi-Power everywhere else. Conditioned as we were to single action triggers, the long first pull of the CZ-75, particularly when coupled with the somewhat questionable commitment to manufacturing excellence down at the old Uherský Brod of 1975, not to mention a good old-fashioned red scare, relegated it to use primarily among eastern bloc countries and third world armies.
Fast forward through the end of a superpower, the total collapse of an entire political ideology, and the end of the Cold War (see our article on the 10mm Auto for details as to how this occurred) and the CZ-75 found itself reinvented as a competition gun in the form of the Shadow. Owing in part to the particular rules of IPSC Production class, the Shadow, with its easily massaged trigger weights, readily available factory speed parts, legal-by-grams-and-millimetres design, reasonable price thanks to low Czech labour costs, and similarity to the already-popular Tanfoglio pistols, rapidly came to dominate the Production division. Offered in a bewildering range of variants which we won’t detail because we literally can’t understand them all (but just as a sampling, there’s a Shadow Tac II, a Shadow Mate, a Shadow Line, a Czech Mate, a Tactical Sport, a Tactical Sport Orange which incorporates some of the features of the Czech Mate…and we’re only about halfway through here) the CZ line of pistols has a better eye on competition handgunning than just about anyone. We don’t think they have a model designed to perfectly skirt the rules of every single game, but if they produce a variant designed to win the Glock-only GSSF, that won’t really surprise us.
Regardless, the original SP-01 Shadow was the best deal going in a competition pistol, no question about it. But it was getting a little long in the tooth, and while it remained very competitive in IPSC, the list of features was starting to look a little bit threadbare, and the upmarket editions like the Shadow Mate and so on started looking less like high-dollar options for big money gamers, and more like necessary upgrades.
And so we come to the next generation of the Shadow, the Shadow 2. We’ll just go ahead and get this over with: the Shadow 2 is an excellent pistol and if you’re on the fence about whether it’s worth it to get one, get off the fence. This is a superb gun and there isn’t another pistol in its price range that can touch it. If you want one, get one. You won’t be disappointed.
We’re going to try to avoid drilling down into every technical difference between the Shadow and the Shadow 2 and just treat this as a new pistol for the sake of shooters who aren’t owners of the original, but some comparisons are worth making, in particular with regards to the frame and the trigger.
The frame is two millimetres wider than the original, with a much deeper relief under the beavertail to compensate. The effect is a rounder grip, but it gives up nothing in terms of comfort or even trigger reach to the original. In fact, the noticeable thing about the grip for most of us wasn’t the dimensions, it was the checkering, which is so superior to the original Shadow’s few lines of cast checkering on the front strap that it’s not even a comparison, it’s a revelation. The Shadow 2 is checkered like a quality 1911 is checkered, with sharp, machined lines. The original was usually found at matches with grip tape covering the checkering, which gives some idea of its utility.
The ergonomics of the new frame also include a completely redesigned trigger guard, which now contains a enormous and rather rectangular space, barricaded with a vertical front bar. The frame itself is relieved a bit above the trigger making this the most generously accommodating trigger guard we can think of short of full-custom race guns. If you can’t get your trigger finger on this go-button in a hurry, you’ll have to look elsewhere for the explanation.
The wider frame also houses the new trigger mechanism, which from feel alone shares more with the Tanfoglio trigger than the previous Shadow trigger. The reset is short but positive and tactile, which is exactly how we like them. The previous Shadow had a good trigger, but this is excellent. Even with the factory spring weights, it’s extremely smooth and easy to shoot with a high degree of accuracy. Most competitors will replace those springs within hours of acquisition; it happens that trigger spring kits from the original Shadow will fit the Shadow 2 although the effects of the individual springs will be slightly different on account of the different mechanism. But for people committed to the original platform, take heart: even your accessories will work, for the most part.
One noticeable change which we found both visually apparent and which affected our manipulation of the firearm itself is the new slide. It’s sleek, but it’s also difficult to grab. IPSC shooters likely won’t find this to be a huge detriment, slide lock reloads being somewhat less appealing to employ with regularity when hundredths of a second count, but it’s one of our two quibbles with the gun. We like a meatier slide, and while this slide may well suit the purposes of committed gamers, for us it’s a little awkward.
The other quibble we have is not technically a part of the slide, although the slide features one of the most egregious examples: the font they used for the number 2. I mean come on, guys…that font is appalling. We don’t mind if you use it in ads but machining a weird early-90s euro-dance-party 2 right on the slide…that just hurts us. The one on the grips we can cover with our hands but come on guys, the slide?
On the plus side, if one of your two complaints is “I hate this font” then you know the pistol is very, very good.
Shooting the Shadow 2
So when you get this excited about a pistol just pulling it out of the box, what’s next? You go shoot it, of course. And as it turns out, you draw a crowd and end up letting everyone else shoot it, too.
And it just shoots like a house on fire. The recoil is absurdly soft, likely as a consequence of the high grip and low slide mass. The sharp checkering, if you have hands that can take it, locks the pistol into your hands good and hard and you can launch bullets downrange at any speed you feel confident pressing the trigger. The sights, which are an adjustable rear paired with a fiberoptic front, are exactly what you’d expect on a pistol like this. It’s a shooter’s pistol, no doubt about it. The trigger we immediately loved on the bench was great on the range; that short, positive reset makes it essentially impossible to “short stroke” the trigger as one of our staff has done with several guns when moving at maximum speed (that’s what a lifetime of 1911s gets you). It’s the best reset we’ve ever felt on a trigger, in fact: there’s enough push to take your finger well past the sear even though the entire travel is quite small. The actual break is so short that by the time the reset occurs, you’re already having to press back to get to the sear. In an ideal world, this is just exactly what triggers should feel like.
For the sake of thorough testing, we also tried out the thumb safety. Granted, we know perfectly well that nobody is going to use it very much, since IPSC Production class doesn’t require the use of manual safeties on guns with a double action trigger. In fact, many competitive shooters swap the original thumb safety for a flush safety since they’re not using it to begin with, and not only do they not want to accidentally switch it on, but they commonly find it interferes with a high grip on the pistol. So yes, the safety is pretty irrelevant. But it does work, if you want to take the Shadow 2 into a different game that requires using it.
The mag release is also improved from the original; an interchangeable pad that can be tuned to suit your preferences with a torx wrench.
Shooting the Shadow 2 also brought out another difference: the increase in weight (about 150 grams) combined with the new frame and undercut beavertail make recoil management extremely easy. The heavy steel frame soaks up the already mild 9mm impulse, and the extraordinarily high grip that shooters can take advantage of situates the recoil very low in the hand. The small slide which we found difficult to grip was now an advantage: its low mass makes for a very quick, almost “poppy” recoil that hardly upsets the sights. This is simply one of the easiest guns to shoot quickly that we’ve ever seen.
The remaining changes won’t affect Canadians much, for both good and ill. It’s an Australia-legal barrel length, something we’re happy to report doesn’t mean anything here. Sadly, we can’t benefit from the fact that the magazine capacity in freer jurisdictions has been upped to 19. Sorry, Canadians. You can absolutely buy guns, but a magazine designed to hold eleven or more rounds and not displaying a pop rivet to keep the world from ending? Obviously that is a bridge too far.
In the end, there’s no way to describe the Shadow 2 as anything but an absolutely superior competition piece. With a street price in Canada around $1400, there is nothing that can touch it. If you’re on the fence about upgrading from an original Shadow, we highly recommend it. If you’re giving serious thought to a competition-ready pistol, this is the gun to buy. If you just want to own the best bang-for-buck hammer-fired steel pistol you can buy, get one. The machining throughout is on par with 1911s costing significantly more and the performance aspect is impossible to ignore. As 1911 and Hi-Power aficionados, it pains us to say this, but if you’re buying a metal pistol in this price range and you don’t buy a Shadow 2 right now…boy, you sure better have a good reason. And you better let us know what it is, because we can’t think of one.
BILL C-47: NEW IMPORT/EXPORT CONTROLS OR SOMETHING MORE?
As if the looming UN Marking Regulations weren't bad enough, the Trudeau government introduced Bill C-47 this morning, aimed at imposing new and entirely discretionary import/export regulations for the Canadian firearms industry.
Bill C-47, first read this morning, looks to introduce a new brokering permit for all firearms, ammunition, accessory and optic import/exports. Essentially, if the product being imported or exported has anything to do with firearms, it will require a brokering permit be applied for and issued. Like all new bills, especially those pertaining to firearms, it remains unclear as to the documentation required in order to obtain a permit. While Bill C-47 makes it clear that permits are required only for transactions regarding the import/export of firearms to or from a foreign country, it also requires that all documentation pertaining to the acquisition of an import permit, certificate, or allocation be retained for a period of six years, without providing any further clarification on what that documentation may be... leaving some to wonder if Bill C-47 doesn't allow for the creation of a new firearms registry by way of requiring end-user and consumer data to be recorded on import permit or certificate applications.
To be clear, we are not calling this a gun registry just yet... nor do we expect this to be the rumoured gun bill being worked on by Minister Goodale and his cohorts. However, it does in the very least represent yet another layer of bureaucracy to the business of firearms import and export in an already extremely regulated market, and may be just the first component in a multi-part gun control bill aimed at reducing imports/exports and sales as well as imposing restrictions on private ownership. Unfortunately, as yet, we just do not know.
Troy Defense builds quality ARs (that is, both the 5.56mm AR-15s and their bigger brothers, the 7.62x51mm AR-10) and everybody knows it. They’ve also got a long history of manufacturing everything from folding sights to free-float rails to magazines, and they have a catalogue so deep that the only way to give it a sense of unity was to name every single thing in it “Battle-something”. But that’s another story. No, we came here to talk about what may be the ultimate work-around for AR users who are in jurisdictions that, out of deference to Troy’s preferred nomenclature, we’ll call “embattled”.
We won’t spend pages detailing how semi-automatic guns have been popular for hunting use since the Browning Auto-5, which is over a hundred years old. We won’t obsess how the most popular hunting rifle in Canada for most of recorded history was the lightest, fastest, highest-capacity military rifle we could get our hands on, the Lee Enfield. We won’t derail this review with our frustrations about how elsewhere, the AR-15 is now among the most popular hunting rifles ever built, and is simply another link in an endless chain that sees yesterday’s military and police technology filter down to sporting hands because it’s quality technology that succeeded in the first place because it works well, and that fear-mongering about a rifle on the basis of its appearance is just silliness.
But that is all true, for the record.
At any rate we can’t all live in places where the most popular sporting rifle of our era is legal to take into the bush. The same conditions are endured by millions of our American cousins as well, and while we’re hardly happy about that, the one upside is that the market for “workaround” guns is actually fairly large. And that’s exactly what the Troy PAR is: it’s a workaround for people who are (or would like to be) heavily invested in the AR platform, but who are coping with a legal restriction relating to its design. In some cases, the problem is the semi-automatic action; in Canada, it’s because our legislators wrote the name down on a list of random guns that looked scary. Either way, the PAR solves a very specific problem: what if you really want to use an AR in the field, but you’re not allowed?
Because make no mistake about it, the Troy PAR isn’t just a pump action rifle that looks similar to an AR. This is exactly what the AR would have been, if Eugene Stoner had wanted to design a pump-action rifle. It’s radically different in operation, of course, because it’s a manually operated firearm. Don’t get us wrong; this isn’t a variant and you can’t mate your PAR upper with an AR lower, nor do other critical parts just swap in. It’s a different gun entirely. But if we lived in an alternate universe, this is what an AR could have been.
Heavy Hitter
The Troy PAR we got our hot little hands on is the .308 Winchester edition, making it legal to hunt with everywhere in Canada. It is, unsurprisingly, based closely on the Troy .308 AR platform and comes equipped with a pile of what are ordinarily aftermarket goodies, from the Troy Medieval muzzle brake to the modified Troy TRX rail (sections at three and nine o'clock have been milled out to allow for slide function) to the Troy Battleax stock. Our tester model was supplied with Troy folding sights and Magpul P-mags, but ordinarily the Optic Ready model comes bare of sights.
Inside, the Troy PAR continues its menu of AR parts: the trigger group is pure AR and can be swapped out for any standard AR trigger; the bolt carrier is very slightly modified to handle an operating rod in place of a gas key but the bolt is an AR bolt. The barrel is almost an AR barrel, although obviously it has no gas port, but in theory at least, a different AR barrel could be dropped in after the gas port was soldered closed (or before it was cut, if that option is available to you) as long as the diameter is small enough to allow for the action ring to travel around the barrel.
Seeing the Troy PAR’s pump action work is interesting. The slide itself travels on the slots cut into the rail; the design is extremely rigid and operation is fantastically smooth. The PAR is essentially turned into a manual long-stroke piston gun, the operating rod taking the place of the standard gas tube. The bolt lockup is, of course, exactly like a standard AR, and offers the user an interesting, if somewhat academic, insight into the incredible design of the original Armalite: with no spring tension on the action and a more natural grip than that afforded by the AR’s charging handle, it’s possible to feel just how smooth the operation of an AR-type rifle really is. Answer: spookily smooth. We had to look inside with a flashlight just to convince ourselves the bolt really was rotating into lockup.
Of course, there is a penalty to be paid for all the AR parts commonality: this is still a pump gun, and it doesn’t have the gas-powered extraction of an AR. As such, Troy advises that steel-cased ammo is verboten in this rifle: it just won’t extract reliably. They’ve done everything they can to ease extraction, including fluting the chamber (a decision which has prompted mixed reactions, incidentally: fluted chambers tend to shorten the life of brass although we’re already seeing reports from reloaders who are reusing brass without issue.) Additionally, some critics have speculated that the fluted chamber doesn’t work well with the rotating bolt design. We’re not engineers, but Troy assures us that this is not an issue, and we’re inclined to believe them. They’ve built a lot of guns. But this isn’t a rifle most people will use for huge volumes of surplus ammo anyway.
So we loaded up the Enterprise with brass-cased .308 and headed to the range. And we were not disappointed.
Shooting the Troy PAR
We took a selection of .308 ammo from Federal, Winchester and Hornady, partly because we wanted to see if there was any basis to the speculation we’d heard about the fluted chamber interfering with extraction. Let’s get this out of the way right off the bat: every single round we fed the PAR, from every manufacturer, extracted without issue. We didn’t use steel cased ammo because Troy says not to, and as a result we had no issues with any ammo from any manufacturer. We feel absolutely comfortable saying that this rifle does not have extraction issues.
On top of that, there was no detectable distortion of the brass. Not with 147 grain mil-spec stuff; not with 175 grain match ammo, not with anything in between. Whether this holds true across the board for every single chambering, would couldn’t say, but we’d guess that at the very least, the .308 and .223 versions will not have issues, because pressures in .308 are typically higher and the geometry of the chamber is such that the larger round will have more unsupported brass. If the .308 works fine (and it does, in case that’s not clear) then the .223 should work just as well. We’re chalking the poor extraction theory up to more internet rumour-mongering.
The other notable feature of this rifle is its accuracy. In some ways this shouldn’t have been as surprising as it was: functionally, this is basically a high-quality AR-10, with fewer moving parts at the time of ignition. It’s a little more challenging to shoot offhand for repeatability so if you’re really interested in shooting target rifle from a standing position, this may not be your thing for the simple reason that the motion of racking the slide is a little disruptive to an ideal target stance. But this isn’t a target rifle, it’s a brush gun with the accuracy of a target rifle. Using the Federal Gold Medal Match, we found it to be the equal of many bolt guns we’ve used, and with generic Winchester White Box and Federal XM80 (which is essentially factory seconds of Lake City M80) it would still turn in easy two inch groups when shot unsupported from a bench. The free float rail allows the use of a rest or even bipod if you want to really maximize your accuracy, but the bottom line is that this rifle is unlikely to be a significant hindrance in accurate shooting. We were amazed with its performance at 100 yards. The 1:11.25” barrel seemed to really like the 168 grain Hornady A-max loads, incidentally, although performance at the limits of our personal shooting abilities are difficult to chalk up to ammo alone. But if you want to wring accuracy out of one, we’d start with the A-max or Federal Gold Medal Match.
Is the PAR the solution?
Whether the Troy PAR works for an individual shooter or not is difficult to say. There are a few non-restricted black rifle options in Canada, although nothing this close to the AR platform is readily available, and at the price point it’s being offered, nothing can touch it: the .308 optic ready edition is barely over $1100, and the .223 edition starts a penny shy of a grand. These are extremely well-built and smartly engineered rifles for that money, and if you’re looking for a compact, high-performing brush gun that’ll drop jaws in hunting camp, plus drop targets at any range you feel comfortable attempting, this is your rig. In particular if you’re invested in the AR platform, as so many of us are, we think this gun has a lot going for it. Sure, there will always be people who don’t want to see black guns in the bush, and at the other end of the spectrum people for whom a manual-action rifle is somehow an affront to their beliefs. That’s fine. For the rest of us, tragically mired in the reality of Canadian gun laws, and looking for a solution to the non-restricted black gun conundrum, well, this is established, proven,Troy Defense quality, reliability, and durability, and you can take it in your truck wherever you want to go. We’re calling the Troy PAR a solution par excellence.
BC RESTRICTS CROWN LAND SHOOTING AREAS
The Province of British Columbia is closing numerous popular crown land areas to firearm enthusiasts. The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations has announced that "no shooting" zones have been created within 400 metres of a large number of forest service roads in the Fraser Valley Regional District.
Recreational shooting north of Mission around Stave Lake and Sylvester Road have often been criticized for the oftentimes reckless nature of those involved, as well as the propensity for shooters to leave behind trash and targets ranging from shotgun hulls to propane tanks and junk cars. Reacting to numerous complaints of errant shots, stolen cars, and the literal fields of garbage left behind, the Ministry's new "no shooting" zone regulations go beyond the existing popular areas to include nearly all forest service roads within a similar distance of civilization. Obviously the intent is to avoid seeing similar conditions created in areas that would have otherwise been unaffected by the new regulations had the Ministry limited their scope to the existing shooting areas. The regulations are not applicable to hunting activities.
The loss of some popular shooting areas in a region almost bereft of accessible crown land is, undoubtedly, not a good thing. However, personally having both been shot at and having had family members have more than one bullet pass through their moving vehicle in the area, this news is not a surprise. When any group monopolizes an area of the back country, especially in a manner that is both harmful to the region's ecosystem and dangerous to those trying to enjoy it, governments or law enforcement will step in. So for those reading this elsewhere, let this be a cautionary tale; if you go shooting on crown land pack out more than you packed in and always ensure that your shooting is both safe and courteous to other land users.
FN FNS-9: INTRODUCTION TO THE LONG TERM TEST
Fabrique Nationale d’Herstal, more commonly known as FN, is kind of a big deal. Like a lot of our readers (at least those of us who have sadly bid farewell to being asked for ID at the liquor store even though it’s supposed to be everyone who looks under 30 and come on, I could be 29, right?) the first FN product anyone at Calibre Magazine ever fired was our country’s former service rifle, the mighty FAL, known for decades as the Right Arm of the Free World. The next FN product? The Canadian service pistol, the Browning Hi-Power, . Yes, FN and Canada go together like June snowstorms and swearing, and prohibiting the FAL can’t change that. You hear us, Ottawa? FN FNS-9
We’ll pause here for a moment of silence out of respect for the prohibition and, consequently, effective loss of the FAL to our countrymen.
Tears dried? Stiff drink poured? Okay, let’s mourn the loss of the FAL by doing something positive: let’s celebrate the living. FN Herstal, of course, didn’t go anywhere. They kept right on building some of the most legendary arms in the world. Not only did the FAL and Hi-Power remain in production, but FN’s significance in the military arms trade is truly remarkable. The M249 and M240B light and medium machineguns, not to mention the M2 .50BMG machinegun for when you actually need to erase the fabric of reality itself, are all FN products. The Euro-exotica P90 and the American M16 service rifle, both built by FN. In many cases they compete with other manufacturers who build the same guns under license, so we’re not claiming they’re the sole source of every single gun they make, but no matter how you slice it there is no way to conclude that the Belgian powerhouse is anything but a world-class manufacturer of firearms.
Given FN’s standing in the world of military arms, one question dogs the inquisitive mind: why don’t we see more FN pistols? Leaving aside the classic Hi-Power, and the hen’s-tooth Five-seveN, why haven’t they made more of a dent in the market?
Frankly, it’s probably more of a timing issue than anything. It’s often the case that the first product to market owns the lion’s share of it; at the very least, it becomes the standard to which all other products are challengers. A certain Austrian company got in while the getting was good, and everyone else is playing catch-up against a gun that dominates the market with 80% of law enforcement sales; there’s no way around it. And if you have a multi-decade head start with a popular product, it’s a tough fight to get your product out. The aftermarket support isn’t built in; accessories aren’t as readily available. You’ll fight for every inch of market share.
But what if that just means you have to build a better mousetrap?
And so we come to the FNS-9, built with a four inch barrel for most markets but specially equipped for the Canadian market with the all-important extra quarter inch without which we’d all be dead by now. First of all, we’d like to say that at Calibre, when any firearms manufacturer makes a special run of guns to make it into Canada, we find a place in our hearts for them. When a major military supplier like FN does it, it’s almost more impressive, because let’s face it: FN could ignore the civilian market in Canada and still get fabulously rich off the M249 alone. They’re supporting the Canadian market because they want to. We know, because we sat down with them and talked about it. So we’re starting this review with warm fuzzies.
And this review will be perhaps shorter than we’d like, because the real excitement is yet to come, as we subject the FNS-9 to a long-term test of thousands of rounds. In that testing, we hope to illuminate some of the features in detail, so for the moment, let us simply say that the FNS-9 is a classic striker-fired, polymer framed service pistol that stacks up well against anything we’ve seen. The trigger is better than its competitors; the travel is slightly longer than a Glock’s, but the break is noticeably crisper and it has much less of the creep before the break that many users of striker-fired pistols have grown to accept. The factory sights are good enough to keep unless you have a serious need for something particular; they’re three-dot sights with a large front dot and what’s effectively a U-notch on the rear. That rear sight alone is enough to make us think they consulted real shooters for this build. In combination with the trigger, which not only features an excellent break but is physically a well-built part, being a two piece affair that’s polymer but built to be more rigid and less “flexy” than most of the striker-fired guns we’ve seen, and which presents a smooth, curved profile to the shooter, the FNS-9 is truly a shooter’s service pistol.
The frame is generously checkered with sharply cut pyramids, giving a texture comparable to the Generation 4 Glocks. The front strap has a horizontal serration treatment that we find quite smart; as old 1911 aficionados we’ve seen every front strap treatment known to man, and also endured every form of checkering and experienced all the pitfalls of different types of grips in this area. One thing we’ve noticed: most people do not benefit from overly aggressive front straps. We’ve seen hands torn up harshly by 20 LPI checkering, for example, and in high-volume applications even polymer frames can wear down the fingers of a lot of users. A service pistol needs to be a gun with broad appeal and the grip on the FNS-9 puts the heavy traction where you need it, and takes mercy on the user where possible.
The grip is adjustable, which has become de rigeur for pistols in this segment,and offers enough of a variation that anyone without truly exotic requirements should be accommodated easily. Partly on account of our extensive collection of flat mainspring housing’d 1911s, we switched to the flat backstrap fairly early on into the testing, in spite of the fact that we have size XXL hands. The switch is easy enough: there is a tiny hole in the grip which gives access to a small plastic latch which prevents the backstrap from sliding off. Depress the latch with a 1/16 punch or a finishing nail, and you can slide it down and off the pistol.
The magazine release and slide stop are both ambidextrous, which, in combination with the different grip panels, allows the user to vary technique to match different shooters to the gun. The trigger guard is relatively slim, and intrudes less into the grip than some of its competitors so if you’re used to either relieving trigger guards or putting up with calluses on the first knuckle of your middle finger, you can leave that behind. Partly as a result of the thinner material, there’s a large amount of space in the trigger guard, making it a good option for people who need to wear gloves, or people who have banana fingers. At the same time, the trigger has been shaped to take up almost the entire rear of the trigger guard area, so there’s no issues if you don’t have a bunch of kielbasas growing out of your hand instead of human fingers. Ergonomically, this pistol works.
The slide is nicely machined, with forward and rear cocking serrations and perfectly executed chamfers across the board. We realize this is essentially an aesthetic comment, but at the same time, it shows a high degree of attention to detail that we can’t help but like. It’s easy to look at this pistol and see where the money is going. Gripping the pistol and drawing the slide back, it clears the user’s hand by a good margin even if an exceptionally high grip is taken, the web of the hand being protected by a generous beavertail.
The magazines are, sadly, internally regulated to ten rounds. We know this is a legal requirement. It still makes us sad. They have metal bodies and large baseplates and they work and we can’t find anything about them that causes us concern.
The light rail on the dust cover is picatinny-spaced and so far appears to work well with the Surefire X300 we had handy, although we have yet to fire it in this configuration.
As we’ve said, the real test is yet to come as we pour lead through the FNS-9. Speaking of which we’re open to being sponsored for ammo costs because we think this is going to get ugly, so please, if you’re an ammo manufacturer or importer, feel free to drop us a line. But at this stage, having spent a few weeks and a few hundred rounds with this pistol, we have a very short list of complaints (so far it consists of “holster availability limited”) and a very long list of praise. For the moment, however, we feel our initial warm fuzzies were not unwarranted.
But warm fuzzies are not data. Our goal is to bring data to the table, and as such, this article is only the beginning.
For the next year, Calibre will feed the FNS-9 thousands of rounds. The first 2000 will be conducted without cleaning or additional lubrication, in the spirit of the late Todd Louis Green, a shooter whose life’s work was to introduce objective, quantitative data to pistol testing. The rounds will be logged in Calibre, along with their manufacturer, and any malfunctions or breakages. It will be tested with pistol mounted lights from Streamlight, Surefire and Inforce. It will be run hot, cold, wet, dry, good, bad, and ugly. Every round will be on the clock and nothing will be omitted.
The process to date has been as follows: the FNS-9 was removed from the case, and, in a fit of excitement, fed 50 Blazer Brass and 50 Blazer aluminum with only the initial storage lubricants in place. No malfunctions were noted. Cooler heads prevailed and the pistol was field stripped and a simple mineral oil was liberally applied to all recommended locations, after which the pistol was returned to service.
As of this writing, the FNS-9 in our armoury has seen 478 rounds: 100 Blazer aluminum, 100 Blazer brass, 150 Winchester white box, and 128 reloads. It has been used mostly for drills, but also in competition as the editor’s sidearm in the CQB Service Rifle league. There have been no malfunctions.
The pistol was field stripped for photos but it was not cleaned and no lubricants were added. It will be shot for a minimum of 1522 more rounds before it is lubed again. No, this is not a good way to treat a pistol, but our early experiences have been so positive that we feel the FNS-9 needs to get subjected to some of the same abuse that its competition have famously endured, because right now, we think this pistol is one of the best-kept secrets on the market.
And did we mention the 4.25” Canadian edition is retailing for $700…and we’ve seen the Long Slide .40 for half that?
Stay tuned. This is the beginning of a long road, and one about which we’re very excited: Calibre Magazine’s first long-term endurance testing of a firearm.
CANADA'S FIREARMS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: THE SCORECARD
Seven additional members of the Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee have been named. Here’s how it breaks down:
Annie Buchan - Member of the Pauktuutit Board of Directors
First Nations’ women’s advocate with no public stance on firearms regulation, but is likely to support further regulation.
Ron Bonnett - President of the Canadian Federation of Agriculture
Farming and agriculture advocate with no public stance on firearms regulation.
James (Jim) Couch - President of Ducks Unlimited, and sports shooter and hunter
These additions join former Supreme Court Justice Chair John Major and co-chairs Nathalie Provost (spokesperson for anti-gun group PolySeSouvient) and Olympic athlete Lynda Kiejko, bringing the total number of Firearms Advisory Committee members to 10.
Of the ten members, five represent organizations that are themselves members of the Coalition for Gun Control; an entity aimed at lobbying government for greater regulation of firearms. Additionally, it is likely that at least six are vocally in favour of additional regulation.
Just two are professed firearms owners. Only one is on the record as possessing a restricted firearm of any variety. It is entirely possible that as many as eight members of the Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee do not possess firearms for personal use. No members of the committee have any record of active advocacy on behalf of firearms owners.
According to the Committee Terms of Reference, up to five more members may be named at the Minister's discretion. However, with their first meeting having already been held, it seems unlikely than any new appointees will be named in the near future. Minister of Public Safety Ralph Goodale had this to say;
"I would like to thank the CFAC members for their participation in our first meeting this week. I look forward to continuing to receive thoughtful advice from this Committee. I have great faith that the diverse nature of their backgrounds, their deliberations, and discussions with interested members of the community will help inform the government's work on firearms issues and serve all Canadians well."
COOEY: THE HISTORY OF CANADA'S GUNMAKER
The final Cooey plant in Cobourg was the largest industrial plant in town.
For a variety of reasons, the history of the gun industry in Canada is somewhat abbreviated. While our neighbours to the south lay claim to such storied names as Horace Smith, John Browning, Eugene Stoner, and even one of our own in John C. Garand, Canada’s own experience in the realm of gunmaking has been generally sporadic and typically short-lived. Sure, we had the Ross rifle for a while there, but we all know how well that turned out. Then came John Inglis, who’s huge manufacturing firm did turn out massive quantities of legitimately excellent Hi-Power pistols and a myriad of machine guns for the Allied war effort... but now produces far less exciting products in the form of home appliances. And, of course, today we have Colt Canada, nee Diemaco - just don't try and buy anything from them.
But a few decades ago, long before the socio-cultural and political attack on gun ownership began in this country, one company rose from a single ignominious machine shop in Toronto to a mainstay of our national firearms industry: The H. W. Cooey Machine & Arms Company.
Cooey even participated in local parades; trucking racks of long guns around town.
Like almost all great gunmakers, the story of Cooey begins with the story of a single man: Herbert William Cooey. After dropping out of an apprenticeship with the Grand Trunk Railroad and quitting a job on an assembly line, the then 23-year-old H. W. Cooey opened his first machine shop at the corner of Queen Street and Spadina Avenue in Toronto in 1903, referring to himself somewhat boastfully as a “mechanical expert and practicing machinist.”
Cooey's first plant at Spadina & York.
But by 1907, he’d proven his own rather arrogant statement to be at least partly true when he took the wraps off an automobile of his own design that incorporated a number of innovative features, including a pre-heated fuel source (it was Toronto, after all) and double exhaust valves. At the same time, he’d also proven a shrewd businessman, and after just four years in business, the H.W. Cooey Machine Shop outgrew its Spadina Avenue location, and was forced to move across town into a larger shop at Bridgman and Howland Avenue in order to meet the demand for young Herbert’s talents.
But it wouldn’t be until the First World War that Cooey would turn his prosperous machine shop towards the manufacturing of firearms. Called into action to make various small rifle parts, including the folding rear sight assemblies fitted to the aforementioned ill-fated Ross rifle and other parts for Canadian small-bore training rifles, Herbert Cooey’s firm rapidly set about gaining a reputation for building extremely high-quality parts at reasonable prices. By the time hostilities concluded, Cooey had amassed a substantial amount of knowledge regarding firearms design and manufacture, as well as a significant sum of capital, and he summarily dedicated both to a complete rifle of his own design.
Debuting in 1919 as the Cooey Canuck, the product of his efforts was a single-shot .22 bolt-action rifle, and it was an overnight sensation; immediately proving to be one of the most popular rifles of its time in Canada. Considered highly accurate but very affordably priced, the Canuck even gained international acclaim in 1924, when the rifle won the Certificate of Honour at the British Empire Exhibition at Wembley Park; an industrial exposition created “to stimulate trade, strengthen bonds that bind mother Country to her Sister States and Daughters, to bring into closer contact the one with each other, to enable all who owe allegiance to the British flag to meet and know each other.” And that victory was no small feat either - the Exhibition was the largest ever in 1924, costing 12 million pounds and being attended by 27 million people!
Herbert Cooey and his wife, Suzannah.
But not one to rest on his laurels, at the same time as Cooey’s Canuck was earning fanfare at the Exhibition, Herbert himself was working towards earning some accolades of his own at the 1924 Olympics held in Paris, France. Not only supplying the Canadian national team with the guns they would use in no less than 10 shooting events, Herbert himself ended up with a seat on the Canadian men’s trap team, and would go on to win silver at the games.
By this time, the company known as H. W. Cooey Machine & Gear had committed itself wholly to the manufacture of sporting arms, and changed its name to reflect that, becoming the H. W. Cooey Machine & Arms Company. Advertising the ever-popular Canuck (later renamed the Ace) in a myriad of papers and magazines, Cooey continued to put forth an image of excellent quality and wasn’t afraid to say so with ads that read “Make mine a Cooey - I want the best,” and “Don’t Take a Substitute.” But it was the ad in a 1922 issue of Rod & Gun Canada that perhaps best defined the Cooey rifle as “The ideal Christmas present for the red-blooded boy, whether he lives in the city, the town or the country.”
Cooey’s Single-Shot Rifles: The Cooey Canuck & Model 39
The Cooey Canuck set the stage for what would become, over the course of literally decades, one of the most iconic of Cooey firearms: The single-shot .22. Best known as the Model 39, this action would end up being licensed to a variety of brands ranging from Winchester (eventually) to Sears, and result in probably a dozen different specific models with names like Ace, Bisley Sport, and Model 75. It is, without a doubt, the most widely rebranded rifle in Canadian history.
The Cooey single-shot .22 rifle would birth dozens of various models throughout its lifetime.
The first of Cooey’s designs, this single-shot action that seems so rudimentary today was quite innovative when new, due in large part to the unique automatic half-cock safety. Billed by Herbert as a “patent pending system” (although there is no evidence of patents having ever been filed), this system captured and locked the trigger as the bolt was closed, meaning the gun could not be fired by simply cycling the bolt. Instead, the shooter would have to cycle the bolt, and then pull the tail rearward to fully set the striker, and in doing so, release the trigger from captivity. As a result, the Cooey Canuck was considered one of the safest rifles of its day and this, combined with its diminutive calibre and affordable price, made it popular among younger shooters and more importantly, their parents.
But don’t let that fool you: This is no toy (obviously). Although various models were aimed at (no pun intended) younger audiences of the day, plenty of adults flocked to the early single-shot Cooey rifles due in no small part to their exemplary reputation for accuracy. Even today, well-used examples are easily capable of shooting with accuracy that is on par with or better than many modern bolt-action .22s. And since they are some of the most simple, slow-shooting guns you’ll ever come across, it is highly unlikely that anything will have been worn out through too much use!
Simple, reliable, and safe, the Cooey made for an excellent gift for hundreds of thousands of young Canadians.
By 1929 demand for Cooey rifles, largely driven by Canuck sales, had outgrown the production capacity of Herbert’s facility at Howland and Bridgman, so the new Cooey Machine & Arms Company left Toronto in favour of a new facility in Cobourg. Taking over what was Cobourg’s largest industrial building and the former home of the Ontario Woollen Mill, the new building offered four and a half stories of square footage, and gave the firm the increased manufacturing capacity Herbert desperately needed in order to grow. And grow he did… by creating yet another iconic Canadian rifle: The Cooey repeater.
A Repeater Is Born: The Model 60 & Model 600
Known as the Model 60, Cooey's repeating rifle featured what is best summarized as a new front half; it married the successful (and safe) striker and trigger assembly of the Model 39 to a new bolt and magazine while making seemingly as few changes to the overall construction of the rifle as possible. For example, while the Model 60 was Cooey's first rifle with an external safety (a notch in the receiver that the striker could be rotated into), it still featured the Model 39's half-cock striker-engaging safety; no doubt the result of simple parts sharing between the two. Of course, the half-cock safety no longer engaged every time the bolt was cycled (you need to pull the bolt slightly rearward to engage it), the Model 60 being a repeater, but its seemingly superfluous existence speaks to how heavily Cooey's designs were driven by price.
The later Cooey Model 60 and Model 600 tube magazine-fed rifle continued the single-shot's success.
In terms of what was new, the Model 60's party piece was obviously its magazine; allowing owners to load and fire their Cooeys much more rapidly than the single-shot Model 39 ever did. But unlike today's smallbore rifles, when the Model 60 was being conceived, there was no clear winner in the rimfire war: .22 Short, Long, and Long Rifle were all still commonly available and widely used. Herbert knew his repeater needed to be capable of carrying, chambering, and firing all three, and that meant one thing: He needed a tubular magazine. So, slung below the action and fed by a loading port at the 6-o'clock position was the Model 60’s magazine, long enough to swallow 11 rounds of .22 Long Rifle ammunition.
Marked as a Winchester rifle, this Cooey 600 was one of the rifles made after the Cobourg firm was purchased by Olin-Winchester, but before the plant moved to Lakefield.
But that desire to remain compatible with three very different lengths of ammunition also meant that rounds would need to feed from the magazine directly onto the bolt face, rather than loosely into the action in what's known as "controlled round feed." This brings us to yet another significant update to the venerable Cooey design; the spring-steel extractor. A simple formed piece, the extractor's dual claws (at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions) grab rounds as they slide out of the magazine tail-first, and holds them by their rim against the bolt. By effectively loading rounds in this manner, by the rim, the overall case length is unimportant and so the Model 60 could feed any length of 22 ammunition with equal ease. During extraction, those same dual extractor claws provided a ton of gripping area to pull the fired casing out of the chamber, after which point it would be popped off the bolt face and out of the action by the next round rising out of the magazine and into its place.
As one of Cooey’s most popular rifles, the Cooey Repeater (best known as the 60 and 600 but also having been available under numerous other names) was rugged and reliable, and brought the same level of accuracy Cooey’s single shot rifles were known for to a much more practical package. However, there is no getting around the fact that these are far more complex rifles, and they can be incredibly frustrating when they start to break down. Key parts to keep an eye on include the spring steel extractor, the magazine tube, and the follower. Usually, problems of unreliable ejection can be traced back to shooters too softly working the action, as the rifle’s ability to properly eject and feed rounds is directly related to the force with which the action is manipulated. However, be judicious in your heavy-handedness, as you obviously don’t want to beat the gun up unnecessarily.
The relatively unique Cooey action still works reliably all these years later, but parts can be difficult to source.
Having created the wildly popular Model 60 repeating rifle in 1939, Cooey very quickly found himself once more embroiled in another war-effort economy and again, he tooled up to support the effort - albeit as a gunmaker this time. Creating the Model 82 training rifle (which earned a contract for the procurement of 34,810 rifles by the Canadian Army and R.C.A.F. Air Cadet Corps) by dropping a Model 39 action into a Lee Enfield-shaped stock, Cooey provided the military with a rifle that largely provided little more than drill practice but its historical relevance and relative rarity make it something of a collector’s piece today - if not exceedingly exciting design-wise. But, just as in the months and years following World War I, the Cooey firm was keen to keep growing after the war. So, with Herbert’s son Hubert taking on much of the design work at the company, the two Cooeys directed their engineering talents towards the senior Cooey personal passion: Shotguns.
The Model 84: Cooey’s Break-Action Smoothbore
It is somewhat fitting that one of the first guns designed by Hubert Cooey would also represent a massive departure from the Cooey tradition of rimfire rifle manufacturing. However, as disparate as a smoothbore may have been from Cooey’s bread and butter, Hubert was obviously raised in the Cooey culture and so knew that any shotgun bearing the Cooey name needed to marry practicality, reliability, and value. The best solution? A single-shot break-action.
The Cooey 84/840 is a Canadian gem; handling very nicely and proving incredibly robust.
A massive change from the usual Cooey production, the Model 84 debuted in 1948 as a svelte and compact single-shot break-action shotgun in .410, 28-, 20-, 16-, and 12-guage. Simplicity was at the forefront of Hubert’s mind while creating the 84, as the simple single-shot design kept the lockwork separate from the action, requiring the shooter load the gun and then cock it in a separate action - reminiscent of his father's Model 39 design. As a result, shooters were expected to keep the gun broken or uncocked until ready to shoot, so there are no external safeties. Barrel lengths varied greatly from 26” to 36” long, and although early models were restricted to 2-3/4” long chambers, later Model 840s (the nomenclature change denoting guns made after the 1961 acquisition of Cooey Machine & Arms Co. by Winchester) had 3” long chambers.
The ethos of simplicity is even more evident in breaking the Model 84 down. Unlike most other break-action guns, there is no latch under the fore-end to secure the forestock to the barrels; it is simply held in place by spring tension. Simply pulling the forestock away from the barrels releases it. From there, the gun is further broken down by opening the action (which, coincidentally, can be done by pushing the lever left or right) and pulling the barrels off their pivot, like one would any other break-action.
Breaking down simply, and with so few moving parts, many 84 and 840s remain in use today.
The Model 84 and 840 remained exceptionally popular throughout the gun’s 31-year production run. Over 1.9 million of these shotguns would leave the Cobourg factory before the Cooey brand was mothballed, and Winchester would follow up on the 84/840’s success with their own Model 370, 395, 168, and 37A; all based upon Cooey’s design. And it’s not hard to see why. With a slender receiver, a reliable action, an excellent balance and most of all an exceedingly low price tag, it is a very sought-after shotgun.
Unfortunately, tragedy would befall the Cooey family in the late ‘50s, with Hubert passing away suddenly and unexpectedly in 1957. Herbert would come out of retirement to head the firm that bore his name for a few brief years before selling Cooey Machine and Arms to the Olin Corporation in 1961, shortly before his own death in February of 1962 at age 80. Two years later, Olin had already placed Cooey under the management of their Winchester-Western Division, and Cooey would launch the last project of Hubert Cooey and one of their most successful designs to date and the only Cooey design still in production today: The Model 64.
The Model 64: Cooey’s Continued Living Legacy
Officially launched in 1964 (the same year Ruger launched the 10/22), the Cooey Model 64 had roots in the mid-50’s, when Hubert Cooey recognized Cooey’s need for a semi-automatic repeater to join their strong bolt-action lineup.
The Savage 64, originally known as the Lakefield 64b, was the last gun design penned by a Cooey.
Borrowing heavily from his father’s work on the Model 39, Hubert took a similar bolt, receiver, and trigger design and matched it with a simple direct-blowback system operated via a small action spring mounted to the tail of the bolt assembly. Then, he fitted the trigger group with a simple lever-style safety not unlike that found on the Remington Model 700 (introduced in 1962), and designed a simple but effective 10-round box magazine from which the blowback action would reliably feed.
Still made in the Lakefield plant, where much of Cooey's manufacturing equipment and staff went, the Savage's design is almost unchanged.
Unfortunately, as mentioned, Hubert passed away before the project was seen through to completion. Likewise, the aged Herbert was somewhat overwhelmed when he came out of retirement to take command of the company after his son’s passing; a fact that many indicate as a key motive behind his sale to the Olin Corporation. But Olin, the conglomerate behind Winchester, recognized the value in Hubert’s design and ordered Cooey to put the lightweight and simple Model 64 into production to give the brand something with which to compete against the likes of the Marlin Model 60 and equally new Ruger 10/22.
Like all Cooey firearms, the Model 64 was immediately regarded as simple, efficient, reliable and most of all, a bargain. Even ten years after its introduction, the Model 64 would still be available in Canada for less than $50. Sadly though, even with the long track record of producing excellent products, it wasn’t long before both political and labour issues forced the closure of Herbert’s long-lived Cobourg facility in 1979. But, through some fortunate happenstance, the machinery and hardware used within the Cooey plant would find a new home down the road in Lakefield, Ontario with the aptly named Lakefield Arms Company; a company where many former Cooey employees would also find their next job.
In continual production for decades, the Savage/Lakefield 64 is one of only a handful of Canadian-made guns on the market today.
But Lakefield Arms didn’t just get Cooey’s hardware. They also got the rights to Cooey’s Model 64. So, with the machinery moved and many of the same people manning it, Lakefield Arms retooled the production line and began production of their own Model 64; the Lakefield Arms Model 64B. Even after Lakefield Arms was purchased by Savage Arms in 1995 the production of Hubert Cooey’s Model 64 continued right up to the present day. Now known as the Savage Arms Model 64, it remains one of Savage’s most popular offerings, with no less than six different sub-models currently available.
Before Cooey was dissolved entirely, it is estimated that approximately 12 million firearms would leave Cooey’s various factories. From 1919 until April 1961, production schedules remained a relatively steady 20 firearms per day, which increased dramatically when the firm was sold to Winchester, who in turn replaced the Cobourg facility’s aged machinery with modern hardware. This increased the plant’s production capacity to 2,000 firearms per day. Over 67 different models of firearm would fill the Cooey catalog eventually, with numerous other firearms produced for other brands such as Hiawatha, Iver Johnson, Winchester, Mercury and various others.
While most Cooey designs are relegated to the history books, Savage's 64 keeps at least one Cooey design in production.
That Cooeys are basic, affordable guns cannot be debated. But there’s something about them. They are part of our nation’s shooting heritage. For many of us, they’re the first guns we ever laid hands on, and undoubtedly for many more they will provide a similar service again as we introduce our own young ones to the shooting hobby. They’re rugged, they’re reliable, and they represent a time in Canada’s past when it wasn’t untoward to give a young boy a rifle for his birthday. So if you happen to be lucky enough to own one of these rifles, hold onto it. Look after it. And use it. It’s what they were designed for.
Following up on yesterday’s proclamation of former Supreme Court justice John Major’s appointment as the new Firearms Advisory Committee Chairman, this morning brings with it the much-anticipated naming of the committee’s oft-rumoured female vice-chairs: Lynda Kiejko and Nathalie Provost.
Lynda Kiejko
Lynda Kiejko is a Canadian Olympic athlete who has competed in numerous international competitions, including the 2016 Rio Olympics, and who earned two gold medals in Toronto’s 2015 Pan-Am games for her performance in 10m Air Pistol and 25m Pistol.
Coming from a competitive shooting family with a three-time Olympian father that competed in the shooting sports, Kiejko grew up with a pistol range in her basement, and is now joined by her sister; Olympic competitor (2012 in London) and fellow shooter Dorothy Ludwig. Both Ludwig and Kiejko follow in the footsteps of their father, Bill Hare, who was known jokingly in shooting circles as the Pistol-Packing Preacher. Although Bill Hare passed away from injuries sustained in a car crash in Calgary some 12 years ago, his legacy obviously lives on in both of his daughters, as well as those that knew him. Interviewed by the National Post in 2012, Fran Hare, Bill’s wife mother of Ludwig and Kiejko remarked on her husband’s love of shooting; “People used to ask him: ‘Isn’t shooting a terribly violent activity for somebody in the ministry?’” Fran Hare said. “And his response was: ‘No, it’s a very expensive way of making holes in paper.”
Kiejko herself has, like many athletes at the upper echelons of the Olympic shooting sports, remained relatively quiet on the status of guns in Canada. Having been interviewed by TheGunBlog last year prior to her competition in the Rio Olympics, Kiejko had this to say about Canada’s gun laws;
“I’m a law-abiding citizen. I lock everything up, I put everything away. I travel with it appropriately. I make sure I don’t have my ammunition stored in the same place, you know the long laundry list of laws that we follow.
I follow them because I respect them. This is precious sporting equipment. It can unfortunately be used in the wrong ways, but usually the people who are using it in negative ways aren’t the law-abiding citizens. Those aren’t the people who are following the rules. If someone has the intent to do something dangerous, having a rule in place isn’t really going to stop them.”
Nathalie Provost
A spokesperson for the gun-control organization PolySeSouvient, and survivor of the mass murder at Polytechnique 28 years ago, Nathalie Provost has been an ardent supporter of Canada’s gun control regime.
As an engineering student at Polytechnique, Provost was shot four times by the perpetrator of Canada’s fifth worse mass murder, and has since championed gun control in various forms; most notably her outspoken stance on the since-departed long gun registry and Quebec’s continued attempts to rekindle the same on a provincial scale. Speaking to the Public Safety and National Security Committee on the subject of Bill C-391, the first attempt by the Conservative government to scrap the long gun registry in 2010, Provost had this to say:
“As a society, we cannot disregard the instrument through which Marc Lépine expressed himself. That firearm has marked me forever. It is on this that I intend to focus today. I believe that Canada must be as vigilant as possible when it comes to controlling firearms—all firearms.”
As a spokesperson with PolySeSouvient, Provost has continued her efforts, working with Heidi Rathjen at PolySeSouvient to lobby government to increase restrictions on firearms and their use.
However, a Tweet released earlier today by PolySeSouvient referencing Minister Goodale’s appointment of Provost as vice-chair of the committee and saying simply “Vice-Chair Nathalie Provost of Montreal is a survivor of the Polytechnique shootings and a spokesperson for PolySeSouvient” may land the new appointee and the organization she publicly represents in legal hot water.
According to the terms laid out by the Ministry of Public Safety that reference the purpose of the committee, its composition, and the regulations its members must abide by; “Any member participating in this committee in his or her own personal capacity or as an authorized representative of a specific organization or corporation agrees for the duration of his or her term as a member of this committee not to:
Participate in any contractual process, competitive or otherwise, involving Public Safety Canada;
Apply for or accept receipt of any monies obtained through a Grant or Contribution Agreement involving Public Safety Canada; and
Engage in lobbying activities or work as a registered lobbyist on behalf of any entity making submissions or representations to the Government of Canada on issues relating to the mandate of this committee.”
As the spokesperson for an organization lobbying government specifically on the subject of firearms regulation, in appointing Provost as not only a member of the committee but also it’s vice-chair, it would appear that Provost’s appointment contravenes the Ministry’s own rules regarding conflict of interest.
How this will be addressed by the committee chair and former Supreme Court justice John Major will be among the first issues the committee will undoubtedly face, to say nothing of the effect this apparent conflict of interest may have on the committee’s validity in the eyes of the Canadian public.